Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Multicenter Survey of the Display Air Kerma and Actual Measured Values in IVR X-ray Apparatus].
Tanabe, Nobuaki; Sekiguchi, Hiroyuki; Tsukamoto, Atsuko; Ishida, Hiroyuki; Ueno, Hiroki; Kittaka, Daisuke; Takura, Hiroe; Fujimura, Kohei; Tajima, Osamu; Sato, Hisaya; Tajima, Takamichi; Hiroshima, Hiroshi.
Afiliação
  • Tanabe N; Department of Radiology, Yokohama Municipal Citizen's Hospital.
  • Sekiguchi H; Department of Radiology, Ome Municipal General Hospital.
  • Tsukamoto A; Department of Radiology, Kanto Medical Center NTT EC.
  • Ishida H; Department of Radiology, New Tokyo Hospital.
  • Ueno H; Department of Radiology, Saitama Sekishinkai Hospital (Current address: Philips Japan, Ltd).
  • Kittaka D; Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Health Sciences Biomechanical and Morphological Analysis, Showa University.
  • Takura H; Department of Radiology, Shinkawabashi Hospital (Current address: Department of Radiology, Sakakibara Heart Institute).
  • Fujimura K; Department of Radiology, Tokyo Medical University Hachioji Medical Center.
  • Tajima O; Department of Radiological Technology, Saitama Prefectural Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center.
  • Sato H; Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Showa University.
  • Tajima T; Department of Radiology, Yokohama Municipal Citizen's Hospital.
  • Hiroshima H; Department of Radiology, Yokohama Municipal Citizen's Hospital.
Article em Ja | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31327775
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

We conducted a multicenter study to investigate the current status of difference between the actual values at the patient entrance reference point (PERP) and display air kerma.

METHODS:

We exposure dose and fluoroscopy dose were measured by 32 apparatuses at 32 member institutions of the Japanese Society of Circulation Imaging Technology (CITEC) under unified conditions, and the actual measured values and display air kerma were compared. We entrance doses during fluoroscopy and imaging were measured at the PERP, with focus detector distance (FDD) 110 cm, a copper plate of 3.5 mm in thickness adhered to the front face of flat panel detector (FPD) as absorber, field-of-view (FOV) 18 cm, and the frame rate of 15 f/s, excluding the bed. Display air kerma were recorded at the same time. JIS (Z 4751-2-43 2012) specify "The reference air kerma rate and the cumulative reference air kerma shall not deviate from their respective display air kerma by more than ±35% over the range of 6 mGy/min and 100 mGy to the maximum value." The number of apparatuses display air kerma deviated from this condition and its percentage were obtained.

RESULTS:

The mean difference percentage between actual measured values and display air kerma in 32 apparatuses was approximately 15.6%, with some apparatuses showing substantially different display air kerma.

CONCLUSION:

In order to estimate patients' skin exposure dose from display air kerma more accurately, it is necessary to perform calibration of the apparatus by regular dose measurement or convert values.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Raios X Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: Ja Revista: Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Raios X Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: Ja Revista: Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article