Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Value of a Statistical Life-Year in Sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence From a Large Population-Based Survey in Tanzania.
Patenaude, Bryan N; Semali, Innocent; Killewo, Japhet; Bärnighausen, Till.
Afiliação
  • Patenaude BN; Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: bnp706@mail.harvard.edu.
  • Semali I; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
  • Killewo J; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
  • Bärnighausen T; Department of Global Health & Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA; Heidelberg Institute of Public Health, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Africa Health Research Institute, Somkhele and Durban, South Africa.
Value Health Reg Issues ; 19: 151-156, 2019 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31494486
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The value of a statistical life-year (VSLY) is the central number for the economic allocation of health resources. Nevertheless, empirical data on VSLY are lacking for most low- and middle- income countries. In the absence of empirically established VSLY, researchers typically use an arbitrary 3-times multiple of per-capita gross domestic product or per-capita income per life-year saved to establish cost-effectiveness.

OBJECTIVE:

In this study, we establish an empirical VSLY for the first time for a community in sub-Saharan Africa.

METHODS:

To empirically establish VSLY, we randomly selected 4000 individuals in the Ukonga community of Tanzania and employed a contingent valuation survey to measure VSLY. Using the contingent valuation methodology, we elicited willingness to pay for a 2% mortality risk reduction and had individuals convert this into an annualized payment to be paid each year over their expected remaining life.

RESULTS:

We compared our elicited value to per-capita income and found that mean VSLY is $9340 (95% CI $6206-$12 373). The mean annual income in our sample was $2069, resulting in a VSLY that is equivalent to 4.5 times per-capita income.

CONCLUSION:

Our results provide empirical evidence to support moving away from using the World Health Organization cost-effectiveness thresholds in practice because they will likely result in inefficient underinvestment in cost-effective interventions, even in relatively poor samples.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 11_ODS3_cobertura_universal / 1_ASSA2030 / 2_ODS3 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Expectativa de Vida / Análise Custo-Benefício / Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida / Política de Saúde Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: Africa Idioma: En Revista: Value Health Reg Issues Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 11_ODS3_cobertura_universal / 1_ASSA2030 / 2_ODS3 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Expectativa de Vida / Análise Custo-Benefício / Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida / Política de Saúde Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: Africa Idioma: En Revista: Value Health Reg Issues Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article