Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of a Time Delay for Concomitant Chemoradiation After Surgery for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: A Single-Institution Study with Subgroup Analysis According to the Extent of Tumor Resection.
Ahn, Stephen; Park, Jae-Sung; Song, Jin Ho; Jeun, Sin-Soo; Hong, Yong-Kil.
Afiliação
  • Ahn S; Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
  • Park JS; Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea. Electronic address: jspark82@catholic.ac.kr.
  • Song JH; Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
  • Jeun SS; Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
  • Hong YK; Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
World Neurosurg ; 133: e640-e645, 2020 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31568907
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Concomitant chemoradiation (CCRT) after surgical resection has been established as standard care for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). However, the optimal time interval from surgery to starting CCRT (IST) remains controversial.

METHODS:

The electronic medical records of 160 patients with newly diagnosed GBM treated at our institution between 2009 and 2016 were examined retrospectively. The eligibility criteria were newly diagnosed GBM, pathology confirmed by craniotomy or stereotactic biopsy, and CCRT performed in our institution. Patients who received CCRT within 28 days after surgery were defined as the early group, and those who received CCRT at >28 days after surgery were defined as the delayed group.

RESULTS:

We included 138 patients who met our eligibility criteria. The median IST was 26 days (range, 10-55 days). In a Kaplan-Meier analysis, overall survival (OS) did not differ between groups (15.5 month for the early group vs. 14.5 months for the delayed group; P = 0.707). In the gross total resection (GTR) subgroup, OS did not differ significantly (20.0 months for the early vs. 21.0 months for the delayed group; P = 0.854). In the non-GTR subgroup, however, the early group had better OS than the delayed group (11.0 months vs. 5.0 months; P = 0.029).

CONCLUSIONS:

Performing CCRT within versus after 28 days after surgery did not result in a statistically significant difference in OS. However, a subgroup analysis showed that delayed CCRT may be associated with worse OS in the non-GTR group.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Encefálicas / Glioblastoma / Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos / Quimiorradioterapia Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: World Neurosurg Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Encefálicas / Glioblastoma / Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos / Quimiorradioterapia Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: World Neurosurg Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article