Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy of Brazilian Propolis Supplementation for Japanese Lactating Women for Atopic Sensitization and Nonspecific Symptoms in Their Offspring: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
Igarashi, Gen; Segawa, Takaaki; Akiyama, Naoe; Nishino, Tamon; Ito, Takeru; Tachimoto, Hiroshi; Urashima, Mitsuyoshi.
Afiliação
  • Igarashi G; Division of Molecular Epidemiology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan.
  • Segawa T; Pfizer Japan Inc., Shibuya-ku, Tokyo 151-8589, Japan.
  • Akiyama N; Segawa Clinic, Mishima City, Shizuoka 411-0039, Japan.
  • Nishino T; Department of Pediatrics, Fuji City General Hospital, Fuji City, Shizuoka 417-8567, Japan.
  • Ito T; Kapibara Kids Clinic, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-0072, Japan.
  • Tachimoto H; Alpaca Kids ENT Clinic, Toshima-ku, Tokyo 171-0052, Japan.
  • Urashima M; Department of Pediatrics, Atsugi City Hospital, Atsugi, Kanagawa 243-8588, Japan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31611924
ABSTRACT
Propolis is a natural product collected from several plants by honeybees and mixed with beeswax and salivary enzymes. In animal models, propolis suppressed IgE-mediated allergies. However, there is no clinical evidence that propolis prevents human atopic sensitization, to the best of our knowledge. Therefore, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted to assess whether propolis supplementation for lactating women increases or decreases the level of total IgE and antigen-specific IgE in the serum of their offspring (i.e., atopic sensitization) at the time of their first birthday. In addition, whether propolis supplementation improves or worsens nonspecific symptoms (e.g., eczema) in the lactating women and their offspring was also investigated. This trial is registered with UMIN000020794. Eligible pairs of mothers and their offspring (n=80) were randomized to two groups propolis (n=40) and placebo (n=40). Participants were evaluated every month, and 31 (78%) of the propolis group and 23 (58%) of the placebo group underwent blood tests at the first birthday of the offspring. Total IgE ≥ 10 UA/ml was seen in 26 (84%) infants whose mothers were given propolis, which was not significantly different from the 19 (86%) given placebo (P=0.80). Total IgE as a continuous variable was not significantly different between the propolis and placebo groups (P=0.70). Antigen-specific IgE levels for mites, egg white, cow's milk, and wheat, as both dichotomous and continuous variables, were not significantly different between the two groups. Both in mothers and their offspring, there were no significant differences in the subjective improvements of nonspecific symptoms between the two groups. Except for one mother who had transient and mild nausea, none of the other mothers or their offspring developed severe adverse events during the follow-up period. In conclusion, compared with placebo, Brazilian propolis supplementation did not influence the risk of atopic sensitization in infants and neither did it improve nor worsen nonspecific symptoms in either mothers or their infants.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies País/Região como assunto: America do sul / Brasil Idioma: En Revista: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies País/Região como assunto: America do sul / Brasil Idioma: En Revista: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article