Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative effectiveness of risk mitigation strategies to prevent fetal exposure to mycophenolate.
Sarayani, Amir; Albogami, Yasser; Elkhider, Mohannad; Hincapie-Castillo, Juan M; Brumback, Babette A; Winterstein, Almut G.
Afiliação
  • Sarayani A; Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
  • Albogami Y; Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
  • Elkhider M; Department of Clinical Pharmacy, King Saud University College of Pharmacy, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  • Hincapie-Castillo JM; Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
  • Brumback BA; Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
  • Winterstein AG; Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida College of Public Health and Health Professions and College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
BMJ Qual Saf ; 29(8): 636-644, 2020 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31649165
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In 2012, the US Food and Drug Administration approved a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) programme including mandatory prescriber training and a patient/provider acknowledgement form to prevent fetal exposure to mycophenolate. Prior to the REMS, the teratogenic risk was solely mitigated via written information (black box warning, medication guide (MG period)). To date, there is no evidence on the effectiveness of the REMS.

METHODS:

We used a national private health insurance claims database to identify women aged 15-44 who filled ≥1 mycophenolate prescription. To compare fetal exposure during REMS with the MG period, we estimated the prevalence of pregnancy at treatment initiation in a pre/post comparison (analysis 1) and the rate of conception during treatment in a retrospective cohort study (analysis 2). Pregnancy episodes were measured based on diagnosis and procedure codes for pregnancy outcomes or prenatal screening. We used generalised estimating equation models with inverse probability of treatment weighting to calculate risk estimates.

RESULTS:

The adjusted proportion of existing pregnancy per 1000 treatment initiations was 1.7 (95% CI 1.0 to 2.9) vs 4.1 (95% CI 3.2 to 5.4) during the REMS and MG period. The adjusted prevalence ratio and prevalence difference were 0.42 (95% CI 0.24 to 0.74) and -2.4 (95% CI -3.8 to -1.0), respectively. In analysis 2, the adjusted rate of conception was 12.5 (95% CI 8.9 to 17.6) vs 12.9 (95% CI 9.9 to 16.9) per 1000 years of mycophenolate exposure time in the REMS versus MG periods. The adjusted risk ratio and risk difference were 0.97 (95% CI 0.63 to 1.49) and -0.4 (95% CI -5.9 to 5.0), respectively. Sensitivity analyses on the estimated conception date demonstrated robustness of our findings.

CONCLUSION:

While the REMS programme achieved less pregnancies at treatment initiation, it failed to prevent the onset of pregnancy during treatment. Enhanced approaches to ensure effective contraception during treatment should be considered.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Gestão de Riscos Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Qual Saf Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Gestão de Riscos Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Qual Saf Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article