Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validation of the "CHIIDA" and application for PICU triage in children with complicated mild traumatic brain injury.
Neumayer, Katie E; Sweney, Jill; Fenton, Stephen J; Keenan, Heather T; Flaherty, Brian F.
Afiliação
  • Neumayer KE; Division of Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Electronic address: katieneumayer@gmail.com.
  • Sweney J; Division of Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Electronic address: jill.sweney@hsc.utah.edu.
  • Fenton SJ; Division of Pediatric of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Electronic address: stephen.fenton@hsc.utah.edu.
  • Keenan HT; Division of Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Electronic address: heather.keenan@hsc.utah.edu.
  • Flaherty BF; Division of Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Electronic address: brian.flaherty@hsc.utah.edu.
J Pediatr Surg ; 55(7): 1255-1259, 2020 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31685269
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The Children's Intracranial Injury Decision Aid (CHIIDA) was developed to predict which patients with complicated mild traumatic brain injury (cmTBI; GCS ≥13 with depressed skull fracture or intracranial injury) would achieve the composite outcome of neurosurgical intervention, intubation >24 h, or death. The study also explored the CHIIDA as a triage tool to determine need for PICU care. The purpose of this study is to externally validate the CHIIDA and assess its effects on PICU triage.

METHODS:

Retrospective cohort study (January 2016 to December 2017) to validate the CHIIDA to predict the composite outcome and assess its effects as a PICU triage tool at a level 1 pediatric trauma center.

RESULTS:

Of 345 patients with cmTBI, the composite outcome occurred in 16 patients (4.6%). At a cutoff score of 2, the CHIIDA predicted the composite outcome with a sensitivity of 94% (95% CI 67-99%) and specificity of 69% (95% CI 64-74%), similar to the original study. Using the same cutoff score for PICU triage resulted in 48 (71%) more patients admitted to PICU.

CONCLUSIONS:

In our cohort, the CHIIDA predicted the composite outcome well. If applied as a triage tool, it would have resulted in increased unnecessary PICU admissions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, prognosis.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica / Triagem / Cuidados Críticos / Tomada de Decisão Clínica / Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas / Regras de Decisão Clínica Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male / Newborn Idioma: En Revista: J Pediatr Surg Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica / Triagem / Cuidados Críticos / Tomada de Decisão Clínica / Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas / Regras de Decisão Clínica Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male / Newborn Idioma: En Revista: J Pediatr Surg Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article