Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Non-vascularized partial joint transfer for Finger Proximal Interphalangeal joint reconstruction: a series of 9 patients.
Leclère, Franck M; Haug, Luzian; Meier, Rahel; Surke, Carsten; Unglaub, Frank; Vögelin, Esther.
Afiliação
  • Leclère FM; Department of Plastic und Hand Surgery, Bern University Hospital, Inselspital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Haug L; Department of Plastic und Hand Surgery, Bern University Hospital, Inselspital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Meier R; Department of Plastic und Hand Surgery, Bern University Hospital, Inselspital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Surke C; Department of Plastic und Hand Surgery, Bern University Hospital, Inselspital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Unglaub F; Department of Hand Surgery, Vulpius Klinik GmbH, Vulpiusstraße 29, 74906, Bad Rappenau, Deutschland.
  • Vögelin E; Department of Plastic und Hand Surgery, Bern University Hospital, Inselspital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse, 3010, Bern, Switzerland. esther.voegelin@insel.ch.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 140(1): 139-144, 2020 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31691006
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Finger proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP) reconstruction after the destruction of parts of the joint remains challenging. Surgical techniques include implant arthroplasty, arthrodesis, free vascularized joint transfer, and non-vascularized bone and joint transfer. This study analyzes our experience after non-vascularized transfer in terms of range of motion, postoperative rehabilitation, and patient satisfaction. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Between 2009 and 2014, ten patients underwent non-vascularized partial joint transfer for PIP joint reconstruction. One of them was lost to follow-up. Included patients had osteochondral partial joint transplants of 25-50% of the toes (n = 4) and the hand (n = 5). Range of motion (ROM), grip-, and pinch-strength were measured at the last follow-up control and compared to the healthy side. Patients were asked to score the pain at rest/ on load on a visual scale (VAS 0 = no pain; 10 = excruciating pain). Satisfaction self-assessment was evaluated by asking the patients to grade their postoperative result as excellent, very good, good or poor.

RESULTS:

Mean follow-up period was 4.0 years (range 1.2-7.9 years). Mean PIP joint flexion was 93 ± 26° at the last follow-up control. Mean grip- and pinch-strength of the operated side at the last control were, respectively, 43 ± 18 kg and 8 ± 5 kg, close to the healthy side values (45 ± 15 kg and 9 ± 4 kg). Mean pain at rest/on load measured on a visual scale was, respectively, 0.3 ± 1 and 1.8 ± 2. Eight patients (89%) rated their operation as excellent, and one as poor.

CONCLUSION:

In this study, non-vascularized partial joint transfer provides a mobile and stable PIP joint 4 years after reconstruction. The surgical technique presented herein is complex depending on additional injuries but results in great patient satisfaction.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Articulações dos Dedos / Articulações Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Articulações dos Dedos / Articulações Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article