Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reliability of isometric and isokinetic trunk flexor strength using a functional electromechanical dynamometer.
Rodriguez-Perea, Angela; Chirosa Ríos, Luis J; Martinez-Garcia, Dario; Ulloa-Díaz, David; Guede Rojas, Francisco; Jerez-Mayorga, Daniel; Chirosa Rios, Ignacio J.
Afiliação
  • Rodriguez-Perea A; Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Granada, Spain.
  • Chirosa Ríos LJ; Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Granada, Spain.
  • Martinez-Garcia D; Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Granada, Spain.
  • Ulloa-Díaz D; Department of Sports Sciences and Physical Conditioning, Faculty of Education, CIEDE, Catholic University of Most Holy Conception, Concepcion, Concepcion, Chile.
  • Guede Rojas F; Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidad Andres Bello, Concepcion, Chile.
  • Jerez-Mayorga D; Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile.
  • Chirosa Rios IJ; Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Granada, Spain.
PeerJ ; 7: e7883, 2019.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31695965
ABSTRACT

AIM:

To determine the absolute and relative reliability of functional trunk tests, using a functional electromechanical dynamometer to evaluate the isokinetic strength of trunk flexors and to determine the most reliable assessment condition, in order to compare the absolute and relative reliability of mean force and peak force of trunk flexors and to determine which isokinetic condition of evaluation is best related to the maximum isometric.

METHODS:

Test-retest of thirty-seven physically active male student volunteers who performed the different protocols, isometric contraction and the combination of three velocities (V1 = 015 m s-1 , V2 = 0.30 m  s-1, V3 = 0.45 m s-1) and two range of movement (R1 = 25% cm ; R2 = 50% cm) protocols.

RESULTS:

All protocols to evaluate trunk flexors showed an absolute reliability provided a stable repeatability for isometric and dynamic protocols with a coefficient of variation (CV) being below 10% and a high or very high relative reliability (0.69 < intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] > 0.86). The more reliable strength manifestation (CV = 6.82%) to evaluate the concentric contraction of trunk flexors was mean force, with 0.15 m  s-1 and short range of movement (V1R1) condition. The most reliable strength manifestation to evaluate the eccentric contraction of trunk flexors was peak force, with 0.15 m  s-1 and a large range of movement (V1R2; CV = 5.07%), and the most reliable way to evaluate isometric trunk flexors was by peak force (CV = 7.72%). The mean force of eccentric trunk flexor strength with 0.45 m  s-1 and short range of movement (V3R1) condition (r = 0.73) was best related to the maximum isometric contraction.

CONCLUSION:

Functional electromechanical dynamometry is a reliable evaluation system for assessment of trunk flexor strength.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: PeerJ Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: PeerJ Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article