Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Randomized Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics and Bioavailability of Fluticasone Propionate Delivered via Xhance Exhalation Delivery System Versus Flonase Nasal Spray and Flovent HFA Inhalational Aerosol.
Messina, John C; Offman, Elliot; Carothers, Jennifer L; Mahmoud, Ramy A.
Afiliação
  • Messina JC; OptiNose US Inc., Yardley, PA, United States. Electronic address: john.messina@optinose.com.
  • Offman E; Certara, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Carothers JL; OptiNose US Inc., Yardley, PA, United States.
  • Mahmoud RA; OptiNose US Inc., Yardley, PA, United States.
Clin Ther ; 41(11): 2343-2356, 2019 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31732149
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The exhalation delivery system with fluticasone propionate (Xhance®) has been shown to deliver drug substantially more broadly in the nasal cavity (particularly into superior/posterior regions), with less off-target loss of drug to drip-out and swallowing, than conventional nasal sprays. This open-label study evaluated the systemic bioavailability of Xhance® by comparing the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of a single dose of fluticasone from 3 products administering the drug using 3 different devices Xhance®, Flonase® (fluticasone propionate inhalational nasal spray), and Flovent® HFA (fluticasone propionate inhalational aerosol).

METHODS:

This open-label study was conducted in 2 parts. Study part 1 compared systemic exposure with a single dose of Xhance® 186 or 372 µg versus Flonase® 400 µg (3-way, 3-treatment, 3-sequence, randomized crossover in healthy subjects; n = 90). A separate study, part 2, under the same umbrella protocol, compared systemic exposure with Xhance® 372 µg versus Flovent® HFA 440 µg (2-way, 2-treatment, 2-sequence, randomized crossover in patients with mild to moderate asthma; n = 30).

FINDINGS:

With Xhance® 186 µg, the geometric least squares mean (LSM) Cmax was higher than with Flonase® 400 µg (16.02 vs 11.66 pg/mL, respectively; geometric mean ratio [GMR], 137.42%) and the geometric LSM AUC0-∞ values were similar (97.30 vs 99.61 pg · h/mL; GMR, 97.78%). With Xhance® 372 µg, the geometric LSM Cmax and AUC0-∞ were higher than with Flonase® 400 µg (Cmax, 23.50 vs 11.66 pg/mL [GMR, 201.53%]; AUC0-∞, 146.61 vs 99.61 pg · h/mL [GMR, 147.19%]). In part 2, the geometric LSM Cmax and AUC0-∞ values were lower with Xhance® 372 µg than with Flovent® HFA 440 µg (Cmax, 25.28 vs 40.02 pg/mL [GMR, 63.18%]; AUC0-∞, 205.78 vs 415.16 pg · h/mL [GMR, 49.57%]). IMPLICATIONS Similar intranasal doses of Xhance® (372 µg) and Flonase® (400 µg) are clearly not bioequivalent. Systemic exposure is very low with all products. Systemic exposure is higher with Xhance® than with Flonase® and substantially lower than with Flovent® HFA 440 µg and, based on dose normalization, Flovent® HFA 220 µg. ClincalTrials.gov identifier NCT02266927.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sprays Nasais / Fluticasona / Anti-Inflamatórios Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Clin Ther Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sprays Nasais / Fluticasona / Anti-Inflamatórios Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Clin Ther Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article