Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Direct benefits and evolutionary transitions to complex societies.
Dey, Cody J; O'Connor, Constance M; Wilkinson, Holly; Shultz, Susanne; Balshine, Sigal; Fitzpatrick, John L.
Afiliação
  • Dey CJ; Department of Psychology, Neuroscience, and Behaviour, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, L8S 4K1, Ontario, Canada.
  • O'Connor CM; Department of Biology, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, L8S 4K1, Ontario, Canada.
  • Wilkinson H; † Present addresses: Great Lakes Institute for Environmental Research, University of Windsor, 401 Sunset Avenue, Windsor, Ontario, N9B 3P4, Canada (C.J.D.). Wildlife Conservation Society of Canada, 10 Cumberland Street North, Thunder Bay, Ontario P7A 4K9, Canada (C.M.O).
  • Shultz S; Department of Psychology, Neuroscience, and Behaviour, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, L8S 4K1, Ontario, Canada.
  • Balshine S; † Present addresses: Great Lakes Institute for Environmental Research, University of Windsor, 401 Sunset Avenue, Windsor, Ontario, N9B 3P4, Canada (C.J.D.). Wildlife Conservation Society of Canada, 10 Cumberland Street North, Thunder Bay, Ontario P7A 4K9, Canada (C.M.O).
  • Fitzpatrick JL; Computational and Evolutionary Biology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Nat Ecol Evol ; 1(5): 137, 2017 Apr 18.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31745094
The selective forces that drive the evolution of cooperation have been intensely debated. Evolutionary transitions to cooperative breeding, a complex form of cooperation, have been hypothesized to be linked to low degrees of promiscuity, which increases intragroup relatedness and the indirect (that is, kin selected) benefits of helping. However, ecological factors also promote cooperative breeding, and may be more important than relatedness in some contexts. Identifying the key evolutionary drivers of cooperative breeding therefore requires an integrated assessment of these hypotheses. Here we show, using a phylogenetic framework that explicitly evaluates mating behaviours and ecological factors, that evolutionary transitions to cooperative breeding in cichlid fishes were not associated with social monogamy. Instead, group living, biparental care and diet type directly favoured the evolution of cooperative breeding. Our results suggest that cichlid fishes exhibit an alternative path to the evolution of complex societies compared to other previously studied vertebrates, and these transitions are driven primarily by direct fitness benefits.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Nat Ecol Evol Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Nat Ecol Evol Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article