Observation Versus Immediate Reinduction for Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients With Indeterminate Day 14 Bone Marrow Results.

INTRODUCTION: The benefit of immediate reinduction chemotherapy for patients with indeterminate day 14 bone marrow results (≤ 20% cellularity and 5%-20% blasts) remains unclear. We report our experience with patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with indeterminate day 14 bone marrow biopsy results treated with reinduction chemotherapy versus observation alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study to assess the outcomes of adult patients with newly diagnosed AML treated with or without reinduction chemotherapy for indeterminate day 14 bone marrow results. RESULTS: We identified 50 patients with indeterminate day 14 bone marrow results. Of the 50 patients, 25 (50%) had received reinduction therapy and 25 (50%) had not. Of the 50 patients, 24 (48%) had poor risk disease, 12 in the reinduction arm (10 with an abnormal karyotype and 2 with a normal karyotype with molecular abnormalities) and 12 in the observation arm (6 with an abnormal karyotype and 6 with a normal karyotype with molecular abnormalities). The overall response rate (complete remission plus complete remission with incomplete count recovery) was similar in both treatment arms (80% vs. 80%). No statistically significant difference was found in the median overall survival (13 months vs. 21 months; P = .88) or relapse-free survival (13 months vs. 33 months; P = .53) between the 2 treatment arms. CONCLUSION: Our study did not find a statistically significant difference in the overall response rates or survival outcome measures for patients with AML and indeterminate day 14 bone marrow in the 2 treatment groups. Our findings question the utility of immediate reinduction chemotherapy and raise concern regarding overtreatment in this patient population. Larger studies investigating similar outcomes are warranted to validate our clinical findings.