Central versus Distal Pancreatectomy for Benign or Low-Grade Malignant Lesions in the Pancreatic Neck and Proximal Body.
Am Surg
; 85(11): 1239-1245, 2019 Nov 01.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-31775965
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the clinical outcomes of central pancreatectomy (CP) with distal pancreatectomy (DP). PubMed, Web of Knowledge, and Ovid's database were searched for studies published in English language between January 1990 and December 2018. A meta-analysis was performed to compare the clinical outcomes of CP versus DP. Nineteen trials with 1440 patients were analyzed. Although there were no significant differences in the rate of intraoperative blood transfusion between two groups, CP costs more operative time as well as had more intraoperative blood loss than DP. Furthermore, the overall complication rate, pancreatic fistula rate, and the clinically significant pancreatic fistula rate were significantly higher in the CP group. On the other hand, CP had a lower risk of endocrine (odds ratio 0.17; 95% confidence interval 0.10, 0.29; P < 0.05) and exocrine insufficiency (odds ratio 0.22; 95% confidence interval 0.10, 0.48; P < 0.05). CP was associated with a higher pancreatic fistula rate, and it should be performed in selected patients who need preservation of the pancreas, which is of utmost importance.
Buscar no Google
Coleções:
01-internacional
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Pancreatectomia
/
Neoplasias Pancreáticas
/
Complicações Pós-Operatórias
/
Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica
/
Fístula Pancreática
/
Duração da Cirurgia
Tipo de estudo:
Etiology_studies
/
Systematic_reviews
Limite:
Humans
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Am Surg
Ano de publicação:
2019
Tipo de documento:
Article