Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Targeting Neuroinflammation with Ibudilast to Treat Methamphetamine Use Disorder.
Heinzerling, Keith G; Briones, Marisa; Thames, April D; Hinkin, Charles H; Zhu, Tianle; Wu, Ying Nian; Shoptaw, Steven J.
Afiliação
  • Heinzerling KG; Department of Family Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA. kheinzerling@mednet.ucla.edu.
  • Briones M; Department of Family Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Thames AD; Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Hinkin CH; Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Zhu T; Department of Statistics, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Wu YN; Department of Statistics, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Shoptaw SJ; Department of Family Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
J Neuroimmune Pharmacol ; 15(2): 238-248, 2020 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31820289
ABSTRACT
Methamphetamine (MA) triggers neuroinflammation and medications that counteract MA-induced neuroinflammation may reduce MA-induced neurodegeneration and improve neurocognition and treatment outcomes in MA use disorder. We performed a randomized, placebo-controlled trial to determine the safety and efficacy of ibudilast (IBUD), a phosphodiesterase inhibitor that reduces neuroinflammation, for the treatment of MA use disorder. Treatment-seeking volunteers with MA use disorder were randomly assigned to receive 12 weeks of IBUD 50 mg twice daily (N = 64) or placebo (N = 61) with medication management counseling. Participants visited the outpatient research clinic twice weekly to provide urine specimens for drug screens and undergo study assessments. The primary outcome was end of treatment MA-abstinence (EOTA) during weeks 11 and 12 of treatment. Serum IBUID levels were measured for IBUD participants during week 3 of treatment. There was no difference in EOTA for IBUD (14%) versus placebo (16%, p > 0.05). There was no correlation between serum IBUD levels and MA use during treatment and mean IBUD levels for participants with (mean = 51.3, SD = 20.3) and without (mean = 54.7, SD = 33.0, p = 0.70) EOTA. IBUD was well tolerated. IBUD did not facilitate MA abstinence in this outpatient trial. Whether targeting neuroinflammation, either with IBUD in other subgroups of MA users or clinical trial designs, or with other anti-inflammatory medications, is an effective strategy for treating MA use disorder is not clear. Graphical Abstract The proportion of urine drug screens negative for methamphetamine (MA) during the two week lead-in period (weeks -2 and - 1) and the 12 week medication treatment period (weeks 1-12) for ibudilast versus placebo.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 2_ODS3 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Inibidores de Fosfodiesterase / Piridinas / Mediadores da Inflamação / Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Anfetaminas / Estimulantes do Sistema Nervoso Central / Metanfetamina Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Neuroimmune Pharmacol Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 2_ODS3 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Inibidores de Fosfodiesterase / Piridinas / Mediadores da Inflamação / Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Anfetaminas / Estimulantes do Sistema Nervoso Central / Metanfetamina Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Neuroimmune Pharmacol Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article