Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A novel blood-sampling technique in lactating sows: The mammary vein route.
Scollo, A; Bresciani, C; Romano, G; Tagliaferri, L; Righi, F; Parmigiani, E; Mazzoni, C.
Afiliação
  • Scollo A; Swivet Research Snc, Via E. Che Guevara, 55 - 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy.
  • Bresciani C; University of Parma, Strada del Taglio, 10 - 43126 Parma, Italy.
  • Romano G; Swivet Research Snc, Via E. Che Guevara, 55 - 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy. Electronic address: romano@suivet.it.
  • Tagliaferri L; Swivet Research Snc, Via E. Che Guevara, 55 - 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy.
  • Righi F; University of Parma, Strada del Taglio, 10 - 43126 Parma, Italy.
  • Parmigiani E; University of Parma, Strada del Taglio, 10 - 43126 Parma, Italy.
  • Mazzoni C; Swivet Research Snc, Via E. Che Guevara, 55 - 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Vet J ; 254: 105397, 2019 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31836171
ABSTRACT
In the pig industry, labour efficiency and animal welfare have become two of the most important factors for achieving technical goals and farming competitiveness. Blood sampling is one of the most common sample-collecting techniques, but routine on-field blood collection can be very demanding for farm operators and the welfare of the animals, in particular for lactating sows. The aim of this study was to describe and investigate the mammary vein as a novel means of blood access in lactating sows that does not require coercive restraint. The study involved a total of 68 sows 34 animals were sampled from the jugular vein (Group J) and the other 34 sows from the mammary vein (Group M). Labour time and indicators of the sow welfare (vocalizations during collection and serum cortisol concentration in the 30min after the procedure) were collected from the two groups. The total amount of labour required, calculated as the time employed to perform blood collection multiplied by the number of operators involved in performing the technique (one for Group M and two for Group J, one for restraint and one for sampling), was significantly lower in Group M than Group J (Group M, 39.83±29.45s; Group J, 82.73±55.34s; P<0.001). Mean blood volume collected at T0 was 4.81±2.00mL and 4.84±1.73mL in Group J and Group M, respectively (P>0.05). The percentage of sows that vocalized in Group M was less than in Group J (2.94% vs. 94.12%; P<0.001). Serum cortisol concentrations were not statistically different between the two groups (P>0.05). The present study suggests greater efficiency in terms of saving labour time and reducing sow vocalization during blood collection with the use of mammary vein access compared with jugular vein access.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Suínos / Coleta de Amostras Sanguíneas Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Vet J Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Suínos / Coleta de Amostras Sanguíneas Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Vet J Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article