Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Information around organized breast cancer screening. Do INCa and Cancer Rose meet criteria for decision aids?] / Information autour du dépistage organisé du cancer du sein. L'INCa et Cancer Rose répondent-ils aux critères des outils d'aide à la décision ?
Gocko, X; Fondacci, M; Dibi, C; Plotton, C.
Afiliação
  • Gocko X; Département de médecine générale, faculté de médecine Jacques-Lisfranc, Université Jean-Monnet Saint-Étienne, Saint-Étienne, France; Laboratoire SNA-EPIS EA4607, Saint-Étienne, France; HESPER Health Services and Performance Research EA7425, Lyon, France. Electronic address: xavier.gocko@univ-st-etie
  • Fondacci M; Département de médecine générale, faculté de médecine Jacques-Lisfranc, Université Jean-Monnet Saint-Étienne, Saint-Étienne, France.
  • Dibi C; Département de médecine générale, faculté de médecine Jacques-Lisfranc, Université Jean-Monnet Saint-Étienne, Saint-Étienne, France.
  • Plotton C; Département de médecine générale, faculté de médecine Jacques-Lisfranc, Université Jean-Monnet Saint-Étienne, Saint-Étienne, France.
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique ; 68(1): 33-36, 2020 Feb.
Article em Fr | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31839376
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Controversies around organized breast cancer screening emphasize the need for information for women. In France, the institute of cancer (INCa) is in charge of conveying this information. Cancer Rose's website (CR) provides complementary information considering INCa's incomplete. The objective of this study was to identify if these informations meet criteria for decision aid.

METHODS:

Information documents were selected and analyzed using International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS). Each item was noted A (absent), P (present) or I (present but incomplete).

RESULTS:

Information booklet and press kit for INCa and studies section for CR were the document meeting most criteria. The document meeting fewer criteria were the INCa's video and information leaflet for CR. Videos are more accessible tools for people with lower levels of health literacy. INCa's video did not present the risks of screening and CR's emphasized the risks.

CONCLUSION:

These documents have not been evaluated for intelligibility, clarity and readability. Addressing these criteria limits social inequities and improves health literacy.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Atencao_primaria_forma_integrada Contexto em Saúde: 2_ODS3 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Participação do Paciente / Neoplasias da Mama / Programas de Rastreamento / Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão / Academias e Institutos / Promoção da Saúde Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Female / Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: Fr Revista: Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Atencao_primaria_forma_integrada Contexto em Saúde: 2_ODS3 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Participação do Paciente / Neoplasias da Mama / Programas de Rastreamento / Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão / Academias e Institutos / Promoção da Saúde Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Female / Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: Fr Revista: Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article