Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Obstacle avoidance training for individuals with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Muroi, Daisuke; Ohtera, Shosuke; Kataoka, Yuki; Banno, Masahiro; Tsujimoto, Yasushi; Tsujimoto, Hiraku; Higuchi, Takahiro.
Afiliação
  • Muroi D; Department of Rehabilitation, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, Japan mutyon88@hotmail.com.
  • Ohtera S; Department of Health Promotion Science, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Kataoka Y; Division of Medical Information Technology and Administration Planning, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
  • Banno M; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki General Medical Center, Hyogo, Japan.
  • Tsujimoto Y; Hospital Care Research Unit, Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki General Medical Center, Hyogo, Japan.
  • Tsujimoto H; Department of Psychiatry, Seichiryo Hospital, Aichi, Japan.
  • Higuchi T; Department of Psychiatry, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan.
BMJ Open ; 9(12): e028873, 2019 12 16.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31848159
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To accumulate evidence that obstacle avoidance training alone is effective in improving the locomotor ability of individuals with stroke.

DESIGN:

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

SETTING:

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, ICTRP and PEDro were searched for related information until December 2018. Two independent reviewers extracted data. Outcome measurement data were subjected to meta-analyses using random-effects models. Data syntheses were conducted using RevMan V.5.3, and the certainty of evidence was determined using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.

PARTICIPANTS:

Participants with various types and phases of stroke were included. INTERVENTION The usual gait training including obstacle avoidance training (interventions of any type, intensity, duration and frequency). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME

MEASURES:

Primary outcomes were gait speed, composite gait ability and objective balance ability. Secondary outcomes were subjective balance ability, gait endurance and fall incidence.

RESULTS:

Two randomised controlled trials with a total of 49 participants were used as data sources for this study. The obstacle avoidance training (training) group had lower gait speed than the control group (mean difference (MD) 0.03, 95% CI -0.11 to 0.16, p=0.51). Further, the certainty of evidence was very low. The subjective balance ability (Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale) was not significantly different between the training and control groups (MD 6.65, 95% CI -7.59 to 20.89, p=0.36), and it showed very low certainty of evidence.

CONCLUSIONS:

Obstacle avoidance training may have little or no effect on individuals with stroke. The failure to find the effectiveness of obstacle avoidance training alone is possibly attributable to the insufficient amount of training in the intervention and the lack of well-designed studies that measured relevant outcomes. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42017060691.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 / 2_ODS3 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Caminhada / Acidente Vascular Cerebral / Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 / 2_ODS3 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Caminhada / Acidente Vascular Cerebral / Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article