Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Study design and protocol for a comprehensive evaluation of a UK massive open online course (MOOC) on quality improvement in healthcare.
Smith-Lickess, Sian K; Woodhead, Tricia; Burhouse, Anna; Vasilakis, Christos.
Afiliação
  • Smith-Lickess SK; Bath Centre for Healthcare Innovation (CHI2), School of Management, University of Bath, Bath, Somerset, UK.
  • Woodhead T; Bath Centre for Healthcare Innovation (CHI2), School of Management, University of Bath, Bath, Somerset, UK.
  • Burhouse A; West of England Academic Health Science Network, Bristol, UK.
  • Vasilakis C; Bath Centre for Healthcare Innovation (CHI2), School of Management, University of Bath, Bath, Somerset, UK.
BMJ Open ; 9(12): e031973, 2019 12 23.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31874877
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Massive open online courses (MOOCs) offer a flexible approach to online and distance learning, and are growing in popularity. Several MOOCs are now available, to help learners build on their knowledge in a number of healthcare topics. More research is needed to determine the effectiveness of MOOCs as an online education tool, and explore their long-term impact on learners' professional practice. We present a protocol describing the design of comprehensive, mixed-methods evaluation of a MOOC, 'QualityImprovement (QI) inHealthcare the Case for Change', which aims to improve learner's knowledge and understanding of QI approaches in healthcare, and to increase their confidence in participating, and possibly leading QI projects. METHODS AND

ANALYSIS:

A pre-post study design using quantitative and qualitative methods will be used to evaluate the QI MOOC. Different elements of the RE-AIM (reach, effectiveness and maintenance) and Kirkpatrick (reaction, learning and behaviour) models will be used to guide the evaluation. All learners who register for the course will be invited to participate in the QI MOOC evaluation study. Those who consent will be asked to complete a presurvey to assess baseline QI knowledge (self-report and objective) and perceived confidence in engaging in QI activities. On completion of the course, participants will complete a postsurvey measuring again knowledge and perceived confidence. Feedback on the course content and how it can be improved. A subset of participants will be invited to take part in a follow-up qualitative interview, 3 months after taking the course, to explore in depth how the MOOC impacted their behaviour in practice. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study has been approved by the University of Bath Human Research Ethics Committee (reference 2958). Study findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals, and disseminated at conference and departmental presentations, and more widely using social media, microblogging sites and periodicals aimed at healthcare professionals.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde / Educação a Distância Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Aspecto: Ethics / Implementation_research Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde / Educação a Distância Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Aspecto: Ethics / Implementation_research Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article