Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy of EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis compared with medication alone for unresectable pancreatic cancer in the oxycodone/fentanyl era: a prospective randomized control study.
Kanno, Yoshihide; Koshita, Shinsuke; Masu, Kaori; Ogawa, Takahisa; Kusunose, Hiroaki; Murabayashi, Toji; Sakai, Toshitaka; Kozakai, Fumisato; Ito, Kei.
Afiliação
  • Kanno Y; Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Miyagi, Japan.
  • Koshita S; Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Miyagi, Japan.
  • Masu K; Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Miyagi, Japan.
  • Ogawa T; Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Miyagi, Japan.
  • Kusunose H; Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Miyagi, Japan.
  • Murabayashi T; Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Miyagi, Japan.
  • Sakai T; Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Miyagi, Japan.
  • Kozakai F; Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Miyagi, Japan.
  • Ito K; Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, Miyagi, Japan.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 92(1): 120-130, 2020 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31953188
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The efficacy of celiac plexus neurolysis (CPN) with EUS guidance (EUS-CPN) has not been confirmed in the era of developed opioids. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of EUS-CPN for patients with pancreatic cancer-associated pain to compare medication using oxycodone and/or fentanyl with and without EUS-CPN. METHODS: In this randomized control study involving patients who underwent EUS-CPN and those who did not, pain, quality of life (QOL), and opioid consumption were compared. Standard medicinal treatment using oxycodone and/or fentanyl was performed for both groups. The primary endpoint was defined as the pain evaluated by using a visual analog scale (VAS) rated from a 0 to 10, 4 weeks after the baseline. RESULTS: For 48 registered patients, the outcomes of 24 patients in the EUS-CPN group and 22 patients in the control group were analyzed. EUS-CPN was successfully performed and did not induce severe procedure-related adverse events for all patients in the EUS-CPN group. Although the average pain VAS scores for both groups significantly decreased in comparison with baseline, scores were not statistically different between the groups at week 4 (1.3 ± 1.3 for the EUS-CPN group vs 2.3 ± 2.3 for the control group, P = .10). There was no statistical difference or tendency in favor of EUS-CPN at evaluation points of weeks 1, 2, 8, and 12. Moreover, the average VAS scores for QOL and the average opioid consumption between the groups were not different at all evaluation points. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-CPN for patients with pancreatic cancer-associated pain did not appear to improve pain, QOL, or opioid consumption compared with those who did not undergo EUS-CPN and medicated with oxycodone/fentanyl. Although EUS-CPN can be an option, it was not found to have a large enough impact to be routinely performed for all patients with pain. (Clinical trial registration number: UMIN 000037172.).
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 / 2_ODS3 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Plexo Celíaco Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Gastrointest Endosc Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 / 2_ODS3 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Plexo Celíaco Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Gastrointest Endosc Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article