Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of the Biofire FilmArray meningitis/encephalitis assay for the detection of Cryptococcus neoformans/gattii.
Van, T T; Kim, T H; Butler-Wu, S M.
Afiliação
  • Van TT; Department of Pathology, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Kim TH; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Butler-Wu SM; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Electronic address: butlerwu@usc.edu.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 26(10): 1375-1379, 2020 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31972318
OBJECTIVES: Cryptococcal meningitis (CM) remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality among immunocompromised patients. Laboratory diagnostics for CM includes antigen detection, staining and culture. Data on the performance of the Biofire® FilmArray® meningitis/encephalitis (ME) panel for detecting Cryptococcus neoformans/gattii is limited, with several reports describing false negativity for this target. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 1384 physician-ordered ME panel tests ordered between January 2017 to October 2018 was performed. ME panel results were compared to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) and CSF culture testing and clinical significance of cryptococcal detection was determined. RESULTS: There were 34 patients positive for cryptococcal detection by either ME panel, CSF CrAg or CSF culture in 2.7% of CSF specimens tested (38/1384). Of the 34 patients positive for cryptococcal detection, 85.3% were human immunodeficiency virus positive (29/34). The ME panel detected 32/38 (84.2%) cryptococcal-positive specimens, culture detected 28/38 (73.7%) and CSF CrAg was positive in 37/38 specimens (97.4%). The ME panel had a sensitivity and specificity of 96.4% (95% CI 81.7-99.9%) and 99.6% (95% CI 99.2-99.9%) compared with culture, and 83.8% (95% CI 68.0-93.8%) and 99.9% (95% CI 99.6-100.0%) compared to CSF CrAg testing, respectively. CrAg titres were lower among ME panel-negative, culture-negative specimens compared with ME panel-positive, culture-negative specimens (reciprocal median end-point titres of 128 ± 60 vs. 1920 ± 1730, p 0.04). All five CrAg-positive, ME panel- and culture-negative specimens were obtained from previously treated CM patients. DISCUSSION: The ME panel had high correlation with CSF culture and a somewhat lower correlation with CSF CrAg testing. The potential utility of using negative ME panel test results to predict culture sterility among patients undergoing treatment for CM warrants further study.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 2_ODS3 / 3_ND / 4_TD Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Meningite Criptocócica / Cryptococcus neoformans / Análise Serial de Proteínas / Cryptococcus gattii Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Clin Microbiol Infect Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 2_ODS3 / 3_ND / 4_TD Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Meningite Criptocócica / Cryptococcus neoformans / Análise Serial de Proteínas / Cryptococcus gattii Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Clin Microbiol Infect Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article