Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Image quality in abdominal CT using an iodine contrast reduction algorithm employing patient size and weight and low kV CT technique.
Iyer, Veena R; Ehman, Eric C; Khandelwal, Ashish; Wells, Michael L; Lee, Yong S; Weber, Nikkole M; Johnson, Matthew P; Yu, Lifeng; McCollough, Cynthia H; Fletcher, Joel G.
Afiliação
  • Iyer VR; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Ehman EC; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Khandelwal A; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Wells ML; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Lee YS; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Weber NM; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Johnson MP; Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Yu L; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • McCollough CH; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Fletcher JG; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Acta Radiol ; 61(9): 1186-1195, 2020 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31986894
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Low tube potential-high tube current computed tomography (CT) imaging allows reduction in iodine-based contrast dose and may extend the benefit of routine contrast-enhanced CT exams to patients at risk of nephrotoxicity.

PURPOSE:

To determine the ability of an iodine contrast reduction algorithm to maintain diagnostic image quality for contrast-enhanced abdominal CT. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

CT exams with iodine contrast reduction were prescribed for patients at risk for renal dysfunction. The iodine contrast reduction algorithm combines weight-based contrast volume reduction with patient width-based low tube potential selection and bolus-tracking. Control exams with routine iodine dose were selected based on weight, width, and scan protocol. Three radiologists evaluated image quality and diagnostic confidence using a 4-point scale (<2 acceptable). Another radiologist assessed contrast reduction indications and measured portal vein and liver contrast-to-noise ratios.

RESULTS:

Forty-six contrast reduction algorithm and control exams were compared (mean creatinine 1.6 vs. 1.2 mg/dL, P ≤ 0.0001). Thirty-nine contrast reduction patients had an eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73m2 and 15 had single or transplanted kidney. Mean iodine contrast dose was lower in the contrast reduction group (20.9 vs. 39.4 g/mL, P < 0.0001). Diagnostic confidence was rated as acceptable in 95% (131/138) of contrast reduction and 100% of control exams (1.18-1.28 vs. 1.02-1.13, respectively; P > 0.06). Liver attenuation and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were similar (P = 0.08), but portal vein attenuation and CNR were lower with contrast-reduction (mean 176 vs. 198 HU, P = 0.02; 13 vs. 16, P = 0.0002).

CONCLUSION:

This size-based contrast reduction algorithm using low kV and bolus tracking reduced iodine contrast dose by 50%, while achieving acceptable image quality in 95% of exams.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Algoritmos / Radiografia Abdominal / Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X / Meios de Contraste Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Acta Radiol Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Algoritmos / Radiografia Abdominal / Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X / Meios de Contraste Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Acta Radiol Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article