Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of massage chair therapy versus basic physiotherapy in lower back pain patients: A randomized controlled trial.
Kim, Seung-Kook; Min, Aran; Jeon, Chuljin; Kim, Taeyun; Cho, Soohyun; Lee, Su-Chan; Lee, Choon-Key.
Afiliação
  • Kim SK; Himchan UHS Spine and Joint Centre, University Hospital Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
  • Min A; Joint and Arthritis Research, Orthopedic Surgery, Himchan Hospital, Seoul.
  • Jeon C; Department of Pharmaceutical Medicine and Regulatory Sciences, College of Medicine and Pharmacy, Yonsei University, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim T; Medical R&D Center, Bodyfriend, Seoul.
  • Cho S; Medical R&D Center, Bodyfriend, Seoul.
  • Lee SC; Medical R&D Center, Bodyfriend, Seoul.
  • Lee CK; Medical R&D Center, Bodyfriend, Seoul.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(12): e19514, 2020 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32195952
INTRODUCTION: Low back pain is a chronic recurrent symptom, which can lower the patient's quality of life. With technological development of automated home massage systems, now offers a promising alternative to physiotherapy. However, thus far, the effectiveness of such methods has not been evaluated. We aimed to compare the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a massage chair with those of conventional physiotherapy for the treatment. METHODS: This was a randomized controlled trial with a two-group parallel design. Following randomization and allocation, 56 participants were enrolled to receive either physiotherapy (n = 25) or mechanical massage using the massage chair (n = 31). Pain severity was measured using a visual analog scale (VAS) and satisfaction assessed with the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ). Quality of life modification was analyzed using the Functional Rating Index (FRI). Cost-effectiveness was analyzed by comparing the sum of physiotherapy fees and monthly rental fees for chair massage. RESULTS: Physiotherapy and massage chair were both effective for pain control as assessed with the VAS (P < .001), satisfaction as assessed by MPQ (P < .001) and life quality improvement as assessed by FRI (P < .001) in both groups. Both VAS and FRI scores were significantly higher for physiotherapy than for massage chair (P = .03 and P = .03, respectively). There was no significant difference in MPQ between the two groups. Massage chair therapy was more cost-effective than physiotherapy, at only 60.17% of the physiotherapy cost (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The home massage chair system was cost-effective, but pain control and disability improved more with physiotherapy. However, our results showed that the massage chair is a promising treatment for pain control and quality of life modification, but efficacy is still superior in physiotherapy and the chair is not a replacement for physiotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service, KCT0003157. Retrospectively registered August 2, 2018.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Modalidades de Fisioterapia / Dor Lombar / Manejo da Dor / Massagem Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Medicine (Baltimore) Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Modalidades de Fisioterapia / Dor Lombar / Manejo da Dor / Massagem Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Medicine (Baltimore) Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article