Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of stone elimination capacity and drilling speed of endoscopic clearance lithotripsy devices.
Bader, Markus J; Eisel, Maximilian; Strittmatter, Frank; Nagele, Udo; Stief, Christian G; Pongratz, Thomas; Sroka, Ronald.
Afiliação
  • Bader MJ; UroClinic München, Residenzstraße 18, Munich, Germany. markus.bader@urologie-giesing.de.
  • Eisel M; Department of Urology, University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany. markus.bader@urologie-giesing.de.
  • Strittmatter F; Department of Urology, University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany. max.eisel@med.uni-muenchen.de.
  • Nagele U; Laser-Forschungslabor, LIFE-Zentrum, University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany. max.eisel@med.uni-muenchen.de.
  • Stief CG; Department of Urology, University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Pongratz T; Department of Urology and Andrology, General Hospital Hall in Tirol, Hall in Tirol, Austria.
  • Sroka R; Department of Urology, University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany.
World J Urol ; 39(2): 563-569, 2021 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32277277
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To investigate the fragmentation capacity, clearance time, and drilling speed of combined ultrasonic with impact dual-energy and single energy ultrasonic lithotripter devices.

METHODS:

Stone fragmentation and clearance tests were performed under direct view in an underwater layered hemisphere by four different operators using artificial stones (n = 10/operator). Time for complete clearance was measured. Drilling tests were performed using an underwater setup, consisting of a mounting rack for fixing the lithotripter handpiece with the probe in vertical position and in contact with the stone phantom placed on one side of a balance for defined and constant contact application pressure equivalent to 450 g load. Time until complete perforation or in case of no perforation, the penetration depth after 60 s into the stone sample was recorded. Four devices, one single energy device (SED), one dual-energy dual probe (DEDP), two dual-energy single probe (DESP-1, DESP-2), with different parameters were tested.

RESULTS:

Stone fragmentation and clearance speed were significantly faster for dual-energy device DESP-1 compared to all other devices (p < 0.001). Using DESP-1, the clearance time needed was 26.0 ± 5.0 s followed by DESP-2, SED and DEDP requiring 38.4 ± 5.8 s, 40.1 ± 6.3 s and 46.3 ± 11.6 s, respectively. Regarding the drilling speed, DESP-1 was faster compared to all other devices used (p < 0.05). While the drilling speed of DESP-1 was 0.69 ± 0.19 mm/s, compared to 0.49 ± 0.18 mm/s of DESP-2, 0.47 ± 0.09 mm/s of DEDP, and 0.19 ± 0.03 mm/s of SED.

CONCLUSIONS:

The dual-energy/single-probe device combining ultrasonic vibrations with electromechanical impact was significantly faster in fragmentation and clearing stone phantoms as well as in drilling speed compared to all other devices.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Litotripsia / Cálculos Urinários Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: World J Urol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Litotripsia / Cálculos Urinários Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: World J Urol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article