Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Does osteoporosis affect the healing of subcapital humerus and distal radius fractures?
Gorter, E A; Gerretsen, B M; Krijnen, P; Appelman-Dijkstra, N M; Schipper, I B.
Afiliação
  • Gorter EA; Leiden University Medical Center, Departments of Trauma Surgery, Center for Bone Quality, Leiden, P.O. Box 9600, 2300, RC, Leiden, the Netherlands.
  • Gerretsen BM; Leiden University Medical Center, Departments of Trauma Surgery, Center for Bone Quality, Leiden, P.O. Box 9600, 2300, RC, Leiden, the Netherlands.
  • Krijnen P; Leiden University Medical Center, Departments of Trauma Surgery, Center for Bone Quality, Leiden, P.O. Box 9600, 2300, RC, Leiden, the Netherlands.
  • Appelman-Dijkstra NM; Leiden University Medical Center, Departments of Internal Medicine, Center for Bone Quality, Leiden, P.O. Box 9600, 2300, RC, Leiden, the Netherlands.
  • Schipper IB; Leiden University Medical Center, Departments of Trauma Surgery, Center for Bone Quality, Leiden, P.O. Box 9600, 2300, RC, Leiden, the Netherlands.
J Orthop ; 22: 237-241, 2020.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32425424
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Animal models indicate that osteoporosis may negatively influence the fracture healing process, but clinical studies on this topic are scarce. In this study we investigated the effect of osteoporosis on fracture healing in patients with an upper extremity fracture.

METHODS:

This retrospective cohort study included all patients aged 50 years or older, with a fracture of the proximal humerus or the distal radius treated in the period June 2012 to July 2015 and a DEXA scan within a year after fracture. The incidence of delayed-union and non-union were compared between patients with or without osteoporosis (BMD T score ≤ -2.5SD). A secondary analysis was performed with a more pragmatically definition; BMD T score ≤ -2.5SD or a proximal humerus fracture with a T-score between -2.5SD and -1.0SD.

RESULTS:

Osteoporosis was diagnosed in 133/455 patients (29.2%). A total of 461 fractures (distal radius n = 311 and proximal humerus n = 150) were treated. Radiological delayed- or non-union was described in 11/461 cases (2.4%); all proximal humerus fractures of which 6 cases (1.3%) were clinically manifest. The incidence of delayed- or non-union in fracture treatment did not differ between patients with osteoporosis (5/137 fractures) and the patients without osteoporosis (6/324 fractures) (p = 0.27). In the second analysis a significantly higher incidence was found in patients with osteoporosis (10/214 fractures vs 1/247 fractures p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS:

The results of this study suggest that osteoporosis does not significantly influence the progress of fracture healing in distal radius and proximal humerus fractures, although there seems to be a tendency towards a negative effect.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Orthop Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Orthop Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article