Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mortality as the primary constraint to enhancing nutritional and financial gains from poultry: A multi-year longitudinal study of smallholder farmers in western Kenya.
Otiang, Elkanah; Campbell, Zoë A; Thumbi, Samuel M; Njagi, Lucy W; Nyaga, Philip N; Palmer, Guy H.
Afiliação
  • Otiang E; University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Campbell ZA; Kenya Medical Research Centre, Kisumu, Kenya.
  • Thumbi SM; Washington State University Global Health-Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Njagi LW; Paul G. Allen School for Global Animal Health, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, United States of America.
  • Nyaga PN; International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Palmer GH; University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
PLoS One ; 15(5): e0233691, 2020.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32470070
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Chickens are a widely held economic and nutritional asset in rural Africa and are frequently managed by women. Despite potential benefits of larger flock sizes, the average number of chickens kept at the household level is reported to be low. Whether this reflects decision-making to maximize benefits per unit labor by voluntary reduction of chicken numbers by consumption or sale versus involuntary losses due to mortality is a significant gap in knowledge relevant to improving smallholder household welfare.

METHODS:

In a 4-year longitudinal study of 1,908 smallholder households in rural western Kenya, the number of chickens owned by quarterly census at each household was determined. Households reported gains and losses of chicken over the immediate previous quarter. Gains were classified as on-farm or off-farm; losses were classified as voluntary (sales, gifts, consumption) or involuntary (mortality, unclassified loss).

RESULTS:

The mean number of chickens owned over the 16 quarters was 10, consistent with prior cross-sectional data. Involuntary losses represented 70% of total off-take, while voluntary off-take represented the remaining 30%. Mortality composed 60% of total reported off-take and accounted for most of the involuntary losses. Household consumption, sales, and gifts represented 18%, 9%, and 3% of off-take, respectively.

CONCLUSION:

The overwhelming majority of off-take can be classified as involuntary off-take, principally due to mortality, that does not reflect the owner's decision to maximize value through nutritional gain, income, or social capital. This strongly suggests that there is substantial opportunity to enhance the value of chickens as an asset, both nutritional and income generating, for smallholder households living at poverty level. Our findings suggest that programs emphasizing community level poultry vaccination and feed supplementation are much more likely to be effective than those solely focused on providing chickens.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aves Domésticas / Pobreza / População Rural / Estado Nutricional / Mortalidade / Fazendeiros / Renda Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude Limite: Animals / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: Africa Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aves Domésticas / Pobreza / População Rural / Estado Nutricional / Mortalidade / Fazendeiros / Renda Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude Limite: Animals / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: Africa Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article