Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The current landscape of urological undergraduate education in Canada.
Domes, Trustin; Vellani, Samya; Couture, Félix; Bhojani, Naeem; Andonian, Sero; Ismail, Salima; Rourke, Keith F; MacLellan, Dawn.
Afiliação
  • Domes T; University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
  • Vellani S; University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
  • Couture F; Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
  • Bhojani N; Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
  • Andonian S; McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
  • Ismail S; Université Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
  • Rourke KF; Uinversity of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
  • MacLellan D; Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Can Urol Assoc J ; 14(11): E549-E554, 2020 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32520709
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Urological presentations are commonly seen in primary care and urologists are concerned that educational gaps exist in undergraduate curricula in Canadian medical schools. A pan-Canadian survey of undergraduate urology education directors (UUEDs) was used to determine the current status of undergraduate urology education in Canada.

METHODS:

In the fall of 2018, a survey was administered to all 17 UUEDs representing every Canadian medical school. The survey assessed multiple factors, including the timing and duration of urologist-led instruction, the perceived adequacy of urological content in the curriculum, and the level of preparedness of graduating students.

RESULTS:

The response rate was 100%. Variation in the duration (mean total instructional hours 22.5±17.2 [5-75] hours) and timing of formal urological instruction was seen. The majority of schools covered core content areas, however, erectile dysfunction, urotrauma, and pediatric urology topics were under-represented. One school had a mandatory urology clerkship rotation (one week), while the other 16 schools offered a selective, with 24.3% of students completing this experience. The majority of UUEDs (64.7%) believed the curricular time devoted to urology was inadequate, 29.4% felt that their graduates were unprepared to diagnose and treat common urological problems, and 76.5% strongly agreed or agreed that a national urology curriculum would be useful.

CONCLUSIONS:

There was significant variability in the duration of instruction and delivery of urological topics in Canadian medical schools. There was a perceived need for more urological instruction by most UUEDs, who welcomed a more standardized national curriculum as a strategy to address this need.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Can Urol Assoc J Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Can Urol Assoc J Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article