Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The efficacy of fractional carbon dioxide laser combined with narrow-band ultraviolet B phototherapy for non-segmental vitiligo: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kim, Woo Il; Kim, Sooyoung; Lee, Sang Hoon; Cho, Moon Kyun.
Afiliação
  • Kim WI; Department of Dermatology, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, 59 Daesahwan-ro, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, 04401, South Korea.
  • Kim S; Department of Dermatology, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, 59 Daesahwan-ro, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, 04401, South Korea.
  • Lee SH; Department of Dermatology, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, 170 Jomaru-ro, Bucheon, South Korea.
  • Cho MK; Department of Dermatology, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, 59 Daesahwan-ro, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, 04401, South Korea. mkcho@schmc.ac.kr.
Lasers Med Sci ; 36(1): 165-173, 2021 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32572662
Fractional carbon dioxide (CO2) laser has been used with conventional treatments for vitiligo, demonstrating more effectiveness compared with conventional treatments alone. Especially, fractional CO2 laser combined with narrow-band ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) was shown to induce more improvement compared with NB-UVB monotherapy for treating stable non-segmental vitiligo. However, the effectiveness of fractional CO2 laser plus NB-UVB for the treatment of non-segmental vitiligo remains controversial. Therefore, this study aimed to confirm the safety and efficacy of fractional CO2 laser combined with NB-UVB compared with NB-UVB monotherapy in stable non-segmental vitiligo. We searched the data from different databases, including Cochrane, Embase, and PubMed up to January 2020. Four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for comparison between fractional CO2 laser plus NB-UVB and NB-UVB monotherapy in patients with stable non-segmental vitiligo were included. We performed meta-analyses for repigmentation improvement and patient satisfaction as well as subgroup analyses based on acral or non-acral vitiligo, according to the PRISMA guidelines. The combination treatment showed more superior results than NB-UVB monotherapy (≥ 75% repigmentation, RR 4.60, 95% CI 1.19-17.74; ≥ 50% repigmentation, RR 2.24, 95% CI 0.45-11.17; < 25% repigmentation, RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.60-1.08). Also, fractional CO2 laser plus NB-UVB significantly improved acral and non-acral vitiligo compared with NB-UVB monotherapy (standard mean difference (SMD) 1.24, 95% CI 0.66-1.82; SMD 1.14, 95% CI 0.67-1.60, respectively), while it increased markedly patient satisfaction compared with NB-UVB monotherapy (SMD 1.12, 95% CI 0.66-1.58). Collectively, this meta-analysis suggested that fractional CO2 laser combined with NB-UVB might be more effective for treating non-segmental vitiligo than NB-UVB monotherapy.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Terapia Ultravioleta / Vitiligo / Lasers de Gás Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Lasers Med Sci Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Terapia Ultravioleta / Vitiligo / Lasers de Gás Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Lasers Med Sci Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article