Anlotinib or platinum-pemetrexed as second-line therapy in EGFR T790M-negative lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Clinical management of T790M-negative patients after first-line epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) treatment failure is controversial. Anlotinib is a novel multi-target TKI for tumor angiogenesis and tumor cell proliferation, and it has been approved as a thirdline or beyond treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The impact of anlotinib as a second-line therapy compared with platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy in T790M-negative patients after first-line EGFR-TKIs failed remains unclear. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we reviewed 20 patients who were given anlotinib and 42 patients who received platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy as a control after first-line EGFR-TKIs therapy progression. All the patients were confirmed to be T790M-negative using the cobas EGFR Mutation Test. The primary end point included progression-free survival (PFS) time, objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate. RESULTS: The duration of PFS was significantly longer in the platinum-pemetrexed group than in the anlotinib group (median, 4.5 vs. 3.0 months; HR, 1.972; 95% CI, 1.078 to 3.607; P=0.021). The response rate was significantly better in the platinum-pemetrexed group (30.9%) than that in the anlotinib group (15%), and disease control rate (DCR) of both groups was 70% and 83%, respectively. All the adverse events in anlotinib group appeared to be manageable. CONCLUSIONS: Anlotinib was less effective than platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy in T790M-negative NSCLC patients after disease progression with first-line EGFR-TKIs therapy failure.