Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Abdominoperineal excision in Australasia: clinical outcomes, predictive factors and recent trends of nonrestorative rectal cancer surgery.
Smith, N; Waters, P S; Peacock, O; Kong, J C; Lynch, A C; McCormick, J J; Heriot, A; Warrier, S K.
Afiliação
  • Smith N; Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Waters PS; Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Peacock O; Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Kong JC; Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Lynch AC; Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • McCormick JJ; Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Heriot A; Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Warrier SK; Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Colorectal Dis ; 22(11): 1614-1625, 2020 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32663900
ABSTRACT

AIM:

The decision to perform an abdominoperineal excision (APR) rather than restorative bowel resection relies on a number of clinical factors. There remains great variability in APR rates internationally. The aim of this study was to demonstrate trends of APR surgery in low rectal cancer (< 6 cm from the anal verge) in Australasia and identify predictors of nonrestoration.

METHOD:

This study reviewed a prospectively maintained colorectal registry - the Binational Colorectal Cancer Audit (BCCA) - from general/colorectal surgical units across Australia and New Zealand. Data were analysed to determine factors predictive of nonrestorative resection. Patients were analysed based on the presence (control) or absence (comparison) of a primary anastomosis.

RESULTS:

Of 3628 patients with rectal cancer, 2096 were diagnosed with low rectal cancer between 2007 and 2017. The incidence of APR remained constant over the study period, with 58% of all resections of low rectal cancer being APR. The majority of resections were performed by consultants in urban hospitals (86% vs 14%). Tumours ≤ 3 cm from the anal verge, T4, M1 disease and neoadjuvant therapy were the greatest predictors of APR (P < 0.001). A significantly increased rate of restorative surgery was observed in public hospital settings (59% vs 41%, P < 0.05). The rate of positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) was 7.95%, with significantly increased rates in patients undergoing APR (12.2% vs 6.2%, P < 0.001). CRM positivity was increased in open approaches, T4, N2 and M1 staged disease and in an emergency/urgent setting (P < 0.001 and P < 0.045, respectively). Significantly increased wound and pulmonary complications were observed in the APR cohort (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION:

The rates of APR in Australia and New Zealand remain high but are comparable to international figures, with one-third of rectal cancers being treated by APR. The main determinants of APR are tumour height, T stage and neoadjuvant therapy requirement. CRM positivity was higher in APR patients.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retais / Protectomia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Colorectal Dis Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retais / Protectomia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Colorectal Dis Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article