Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical response assessment after contact X-Ray brachytherapy and chemoradiotherapy for organ preservation in rectal cancer T2-T3 M0: The time/dose factor influence.
Benezery, Karen; Montagne, Lucile; Evesque, Ludovic; Schiappa, Renaud; Hannoun-Levi, Jean-Michel; Francois, Eric; Thamphya, Brice; Gerard, Jean-Pierre.
Afiliação
  • Benezery K; Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Antoine-LACASSAGNE - University Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
  • Montagne L; Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Antoine-LACASSAGNE - University Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
  • Evesque L; Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine-LACASSAGNE - University Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
  • Schiappa R; Department of Statistics, Centre Antoine-LACASSAGNE - University Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
  • Hannoun-Levi JM; Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Antoine-LACASSAGNE - University Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
  • Francois E; Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine-LACASSAGNE - University Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
  • Thamphya B; Department of Statistics, Centre Antoine-LACASSAGNE - University Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
  • Gerard JP; Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Antoine-LACASSAGNE - University Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol ; 24: 92-98, 2020 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32695890
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

A neoadjuvant treatment aimed at rectal preservation should achieve a clinical complete response. This study comparing neoadjuvant treatment initiated with Contact X-ray (CXB) or External Beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is evaluating the influence of the time/dose parameter on clinical response during the first six months. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

This retrospective consecutive series included T2-3 rectal adenocarcinoma staged using digital examination (DRE), endoscopy, magnetic radiation imaging and/or endorectal ultrasound. All patients were treated with organ preservation intent. Treatment protocol combined CXB (80-110 Gy/3-4 fractions) and EBRT ± concurrent capecitabine. In tumor exceeding 3.5 cm treatment was often initiated using EBRT. Clinical response was assessed (DRE, proctoscopy ± imaging) at very close interval between 2 weeks and 6 months after treatment initiation.

RESULTS:

Between 2002 and 2017, 61 patients (T2 31; T3 30) M0 (median age 76 years) were treated. Treatment was initiated in 40 patients (T2 28, T3 12) with contact X-ray and in 21 (T2 4, T3 17) with EBRT. Using contact X-ray or EBRT first treatment, clinical complete (or near complete) response at week 14(±1) was respectively 88% [95CI74-96] and 33% [95CI15-57]. In multivariate analysis the treatment chronology was the most significant factor influencing cCR (OR 7.53). At 6 months, with contact X-ray first all patients were in clinical complete response and five with EBRT remained in partial response. With 61 months median follow-up time, the local recurrence rate was 10% [95% CI 6-16] at 5 years. T3 and fungating tumors were at higher risk of local recurrence. Organ preservation with good function was achieved in 95% of cases.

CONCLUSION:

This non randomized study tends to show that in early T2-3 tumors, a strategy using upfront contact therapy, which is reducing the overall treatment time, is an option allowing a more favorable outcome than EBRT first.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Idioma: En Revista: Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Idioma: En Revista: Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article