Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Quality-of-life after bile duct injury repaired by hepaticojejunostomy: a national cohort study.
Sturesson, Christian; Hemmingsson, Oskar; Månsson, Christopher; Sandström, Per; Strömberg, Cecilia; Taflin, Helena; Rystedt, Jenny.
Afiliação
  • Sturesson C; Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Hemmingsson O; Department of Surgical And Perioperative Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
  • Månsson C; Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Sandström P; Department of Surgery, Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.
  • Strömberg C; Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Taflin H; Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Transplant Centre, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Rystedt J; Department of Surgery, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Scand J Gastroenterol ; 55(9): 1087-1092, 2020 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32735151
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Reports on quality-of-life (QoL) after bile duct injury (BDI) show conflicting results. The aim of this cohort study was to evaluate QoL stratified according to type of treatment.

METHODS:

QoL assessment using the SF-36 (36-item short form health survey) questionnaire. Patients with post-cholecystectomy BDI needing hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) were compared to all other treatments (BDI repair) and to patients without BDI at cholecystectomy (controls).

RESULTS:

Patients needing a HJ after BDI reported reduced long-term QoL irrespective of time for diagnosis and repair in both the physical (PCS; p < .001) and mental (MCS; p < .001) domain compared to both controls and patients with less severe BDI. QoL was comparable for BDI repair (n = 86) and controls (n = 192) in both PCS (p = .171) and MCS (p = .654). As a group, patients with BDI (n = 155) reported worse QoL than controls, in both the PCS (p < .001) and MCS (p = .012). Patients with a BDI detected intraoperatively (n = 124) reported better QoL than patients with a postoperative diagnosis. Patients with an immediate intraoperative repair (n = 99), including HJ, reported a better long-term QoL compared to patients subjected to a later procedure (n = 54).

CONCLUSIONS:

Patients with postoperative diagnosis and patients with BDIs needing biliary reconstruction with HJ both reported reduced long-term QoL.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doenças dos Ductos Biliares / Colecistectomia Laparoscópica Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Scand J Gastroenterol Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doenças dos Ductos Biliares / Colecistectomia Laparoscópica Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Scand J Gastroenterol Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article