Evaluation and comparison of scoring systems for predicting stone-free status after flexible ureteroscopy for renal and ureteral stones.
PLoS One
; 15(8): e0237068, 2020.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-32760154
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate four predictive scores for stone-free rate (SFR) after flexible ureterorenoscopy (f-URS) with holmium-YAG laser fragmentation of renal and ureteral lithiasis. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective analysis of 800 f-URS procedures performed in our institution between January 2009 and December 2016. For each procedure, a single surgeon calculated the following scores: S.T.O.N.E score; Resorlu Unsal Stone Score (RUSS); modified Seoul National University Renal Complexity (S-ReSC) score; and Ito's score. RESULTS: Overall SFR was 74.1%. Univariate analysis demonstrated that stone size (p<0.0001), stone volume (p<0.0001), stone number (p = 0.004), narrow lower pole infundibulopelvic angle (IPA) (p = 0.003) and lower pole location + IPA <45° (p = 0.011) were significantly associated with SFR. All scores differed between the stone-free and non-stone-free groups. Area under the curve of the receiving operator characteristics curve was calculated for each score: 0.617 [95%CI: 0.575-0.660] for the S.T.O.N.E score; 0.644 [95%CI: 0.609-0.680] for the RUSS; 0.651 [95%CI: 0.606-0.697] for the S-ReSC score; and 0.735 [95%CI: 0.692-0.777] for Ito's nomogram. CONCLUSION: All four scores were predictive of SFR after f-URS. Ito's score was the most sensitive. However, the performance of all scores in this analysis was lower than in developmental studies.
Texto completo:
1
Coleções:
01-internacional
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Cálculos Renais
/
Cálculos Ureterais
/
Litotripsia a Laser
/
Ureteroscopia
Tipo de estudo:
Evaluation_studies
/
Observational_studies
/
Prognostic_studies
/
Risk_factors_studies
Limite:
Adult
/
Aged
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
/
Middle aged
Idioma:
En
Revista:
PLoS One
Ano de publicação:
2020
Tipo de documento:
Article