Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Global academic response to COVID-19: Cross-sectional study.
Helliwell, Jack A; Bolton, William S; Burke, Joshua R; Tiernan, Jim P; Jayne, David G; Chapman, Stephen J.
Afiliação
  • Helliwell JA; Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James's University of Leeds Leeds LS9 7TF UK.
  • Bolton WS; Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James's University of Leeds Leeds LS9 7TF UK.
  • Burke JR; Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James's University of Leeds Leeds LS9 7TF UK.
  • Tiernan JP; Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James's University of Leeds Leeds LS9 7TF UK.
  • Jayne DG; Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James's University of Leeds Leeds LS9 7TF UK.
  • Chapman SJ; Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James's University of Leeds Leeds LS9 7TF UK.
Learn Publ ; 33(4): 385-393, 2020 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32836910
ABSTRACT
This study explores the response to COVID-19 from investigators, editors, and publishers and seeks to define challenges during the early stages of the pandemic. A cross-sectional bibliometric review of COVID-19 literature was undertaken between 1 November 2019 and 24 March 2020, along with a comparative review of Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) literature. Investigator responsiveness was assessed by measuring the volume and type of research published. Editorial responsiveness was assessed by measuring the submission-to-acceptance time and availability of original data. Publisher-responsiveness was assessed by measuring the acceptance-to-publication time and the provision of open access. Three hundred and ninety-eight of 2,835 COVID-19 and 55 of 1,513 MERS search results were eligible. Most COVID-19 studies were clinical reports (n = 242; 60.8%). The submission-to-acceptance [median 5 days (IQR 3-11) versus 71.5 days (38-106); P < .001] and acceptance-to-publication [median 5 days (IQR 2-8) versus 22.5 days (4-48·5-; P < .001] times were strikingly shorter for COVID-19. Almost all COVID-19 (n = 396; 99.5%) and MERS (n = 55; 100%) studies were open-access. Data sharing was infrequent, with original data available for 104 (26.1%) COVID-19 and 10 (18.2%) MERS studies (P = .203). The early academic response was characterized by investigators aiming to define the disease. Studies were made rapidly and openly available. Only one-in-four were published alongside original data, which is a key target for improvement. Key points COVID-19 publications show rapid response from investigators, specifically aiming to define the disease.Median time between submission and acceptance of COVID-19 articles is 5 days demonstrating rapid decision-making compared with the median of 71.5 days for MERS articles.Median time from acceptance to publication of COVID-19 articles is 5 days, confirming the ability to introduce rapid increases at times of crisis, such as during the SARS outbreak.The majority of both COVID-19 and MERS articles are available open-access.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Learn Publ Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Learn Publ Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article