Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Endoscopic submucosal dissection of large polyps in the right colon using an endoscopic snare with a double-balloon endolumenal interventional platform: an ex vivo study in a porcine colorectal model.
Urakawa, Shinya; Momose, Kota; Hirashita, Teijiro; Lowenfeld, Lea; Milsom, Jeffrey W.
Afiliação
  • Urakawa S; Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine/New York Presbyterian Hospital, 525 East 68th Street, K-801, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
  • Momose K; Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine/New York Presbyterian Hospital, 525 East 68th Street, K-801, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
  • Hirashita T; Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka, Japan.
  • Lowenfeld L; Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine/New York Presbyterian Hospital, 525 East 68th Street, K-801, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
  • Milsom JW; Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine/New York Presbyterian Hospital, 525 East 68th Street, K-801, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Surg Endosc ; 35(11): 6319-6328, 2021 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33104913
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a challenging procedure for the removal of colorectal tumors, especially tumors located in the right colon. The use of traction could make this procedure technically easier and reduce procedure times and complication rates. In this study, we demonstrated the feasibility and utility of a traction technique utilizing an endoscopic snare through an overtube, a double-balloon endolumenal interventional platform (DEIP) in a porcine colorectal model.

METHODS:

A total of 120 procedures were performed using three different techniques standard ESD technique (STD), ESD with DEIP (DEIP alone), and ESD with DEIP and a snare (DEIP + Snare). The snare was passed inside the overtube and used as a grasper on the tissue to provide traction. Lesions 3 or 4 cm in diameter were removed with a 5 mm margin from the anterior and posterior walls of the proximal Transverse Colon, the Hepatic Flexure, and the posterior wall of the Cecum. The outcomes measured included procedure times and the number of muscularis propria injuries.

RESULTS:

The DEIP + Snare group showed significantly shorter total procedure and submucosal dissection times for lesions in all locations (median 28.1 min (DEIP + Snare, n = 32) vs 39.8 (STD, n = 32) vs 39.7 (DEIP alone, n = 32); 7.5 min vs 25.3 vs 25.1) and had fewer muscularis propria injuries (median 0 [range 0-2] vs 2 [0-7] vs 1 [0-6]) than the two other groups. Larger lesions (4 cm) were successfully removed by regrasping the tissue in DEIP + Snare group, which showed significantly shorter total procedure time [31.4 min (DEIP + Snare, n = 8) vs 40.1 (STD, n = 8) vs 45.6 (DEIP alone, n = 8)] and submucosal dissection time (12.3 min vs 27.6 vs 29.1) than the two other groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

ESD traction technique with an endolumenal platform and snare enables faster removal of large polyps in the right colon with fewer injuries than standard methods of ESD.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Colorretais / Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Surg Endosc Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Colorretais / Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Surg Endosc Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article