Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparing Pain Neuroscience Education Followed by Motor Control Exercises With Group-Based Exercises for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Rabiei, Pouya; Sheikhi, Bahram; Letafatkar, Amir.
Afiliação
  • Rabiei P; Department of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran.
  • Sheikhi B; Sports Injury and Corrective Exercises, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
  • Letafatkar A; Sports Injury and Corrective Exercises, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
Pain Pract ; 21(3): 333-342, 2021 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33135286
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Different individualized interventions have been used to improve chronic low back pain (CLBP). However, their superiority over group-based interventions has yet to be elucidated. We compared an individualized treatment involving pain neuroscience education (PNE) plus motor control exercise (MCE) with group-based exercise (GE) in patients with CLBP.

METHODS:

Seventy-three patients with CLBP were randomly assigned into the PNE plus MCE group (n = 37) and GE group (n = 36). Both PNE plus MCE and GE were administered twice weekly for 8 weeks. Pain intensity (as measured using the VAS), disability (as measured using the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire), fear-avoidance beliefs (as measured using the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire), and self-efficacy (as measured using the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire) were assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention. A 2 × 2 variance analysis (treatment group × time) with a mixed-model design was applied to statistically analyze the data.

RESULTS:

Both groups showed significant improvements in all the outcome measures, with a large effect size (P < 0.001, partial eta squared [ηp2 ] = 0.66 to 0.81) after the intervention. The PNE plus MCE group showed greater improvements, with a moderate effect size in pain intensity (P = 0.041, ηp2  = 0.06) and disability (P = 0.021, ηp2  = 0.07) compared to the GE group. No significant difference was found in fear-avoidance beliefs during physical activity and work, and self-efficacy (P > 0.05) between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION:

PNE and MCE seem to be better at reducing pain intensity and disability compared to GE, while no significant differences were observed for fear-avoidance beliefs and self-efficacy between the 2 groups in patients with CLBP. With regard to the superiority of individualized interventions over group-based ones, more studies are warranted.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 / 2_ODS3 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neurociências / Educação de Pacientes como Assunto / Modalidades de Fisioterapia / Dor Lombar / Dor Crônica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Pain Pract Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 / 2_ODS3 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neurociências / Educação de Pacientes como Assunto / Modalidades de Fisioterapia / Dor Lombar / Dor Crônica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Pain Pract Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article