Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Chronic Foot Pain.
Tafur, Monica; Bencardino, Jenny T; Roberts, Catherine C; Appel, Marc; Bell, Angela M; Gyftopoulos, Soterios; Metter, Darlene F; Mintz, Douglas N; Morrison, William B; Small, Kirstin M S; Subhas, Naveen; Weissman, Barbara N; Yu, Joseph S; Kransdorf, Mark J.
Afiliação
  • Tafur M; University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Bencardino JT; New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York. Electronic address: Jenny.Bencardino@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
  • Roberts CC; Panel Chair, vRad, a MEDNAX Company, Eden Prairie, Minnesota.
  • Appel M; James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, New York; American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.
  • Bell AM; Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois; American College of Physicians.
  • Gyftopoulos S; New York University Medical Center, New York, New York.
  • Metter DF; UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas.
  • Mintz DN; Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.
  • Morrison WB; Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Small KMS; Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Subhas N; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Weissman BN; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Yu JS; The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
  • Kransdorf MJ; Specialty Chair, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 17(11S): S391-S402, 2020 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33153552
ABSTRACT
Chronic foot pain is a frequent clinical complaint, which can significantly impact the quality of live in some individuals. These guidelines define best practices with regards to requisition of imaging studies based on specific clinical scenarios, which have been grouped into different variants. Each variant is accompanied by a brief description of the usefulness, advantages, and limitations of different imaging modalities. The present narrative is the result of an exhaustive assessment of the available literature and a thorough review process by a panel of experts on Musculoskeletal Imaging. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sociedades Médicas / Dor Crônica Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Am Coll Radiol Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sociedades Médicas / Dor Crônica Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Am Coll Radiol Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article