Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Application of a dual energy x-ray absorptiometry derived 4-compartment body composition model: Non-discriminatory against leanness and sex.
Smith-Ryan, Abbie E; Blue, Malia N M; Hirsch, Katie R; Brewer, Gabrielle J.
Afiliação
  • Smith-Ryan AE; Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Human Movement Science Curriculum, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Gillsings School of Public Health, Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina
  • Blue MNM; Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Human Movement Science Curriculum, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Hirsch KR; Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Human Movement Science Curriculum, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Brewer GJ; Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Clin Nutr ESPEN ; 40: 401-405, 2020 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33183569
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Body composition assessment has large variability. A dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) derived four compartment (4C) method has been developed as an accurate and reliable method for assessing body composition in overweight/obese adults. This investigation was aimed at understanding the validity of the DXA-derived 4C equation for use in normal weight individuals, stratified by sex, and with varied levels of lean mass. Values were also compared against DXA alone. METHODS: 78 men and women (68% female; Mean ± SD; Age: 19.2 ± 1.2 yrs; Ht: 168.8 ± 9.1 cm; Wt: 62.8 ± kg) completed a traditional 4C body composition reference assessment. Body composition was also assessed using a DXA-4C model. Validity was evaluated from total error (TE), constant error, and standard error of the estimate (SEE). Proportional bias was identified with Bland Altman plots. RESULTS: Although significantly different (p < 0.05) the DXA-4C model produced ideal TE and SEE compared to the 4C criterion for all body composition outcomes of fat mass (TE: 2.1 kg; SEE: 1.9 kg), lean mass (TE: 2.1 kg; SEE: 1.8 kg), and percent body fat (TE: 3.6%; SEE: 3.4%). Validity results did not differ for men vs. women. DXA-4C estimates were slightly better in individuals with higher lean mass. DXA alone resulted in significantly greater error than DXA-4C (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Body composition assessed from DXA-4C is an accurate approach, particularly in those with high levels of lean mass. This model appears to be more accurate than DXA alone.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Magreza / Composição Corporal Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Clin Nutr ESPEN Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Magreza / Composição Corporal Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Clin Nutr ESPEN Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article