Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation and Clinical Outcomes: A Retrospective Case Series.
Warner, Nafisseh S; Schaefer, Kalli K; Eldrige, Jason S; Lamer, Tim J; Pingree, Matthew J; Bendel, Markus A; Warner, Matthew A; Rho, Richard H; Mauck, William D.
Afiliação
  • Warner NS; Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A.
  • Schaefer KK; Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A.
  • Eldrige JS; Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A.
  • Lamer TJ; Department of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, U.S.A.
  • Pingree MJ; Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A.
  • Bendel MA; Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A.
  • Warner MA; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A.
  • Rho RH; Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A.
  • Mauck WD; Division of Critical Care, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A.
Pain Pract ; 21(4): 411-418, 2021 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33222402
PURPOSE: Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) is a rapidly expanding field within neuromodulation; however, there is limited data on therapeutic efficacy. This study describes the indications and clinical outcomes for patients undergoing PNS for chronic pain states. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective case series of adults undergoing PNS implantation from 2004 to 2017 at an academic medical center. The primary outcomes were changes in numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores, opioid utilization in oral morphine milligram equivalent (MME), and self-reported patient functioning at 6 months postoperatively. Infectious and device-related complications were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 72 patients underwent PNS implantation, including 59 patients that received a preceding PNS trial (59/78; 76% progression rate) and 13 that did not receive a PNS trial. The most common indication for stimulation was occipital neuralgia (47%) followed by lower-extremity neuropathies (17%). PNS implantation was associated with 6-month reductions in pain scores (7 [6, 8] baseline vs. 4 [2, 5] 6 months; P < 0.001) and opioid utilization (eg, median 60 [31, 104] vs. 18 [0, 52] MME among those with baseline opioid use; P < 0.001). Median functional improvement was 73% (50%, 88%). Seven patients (10%) suffered a postoperative surgical site infection at a median of 50 (30, 124) days, of which five devices were removed. CONCLUSION: Peripheral nerve stimulation was associated with reduced pain scores, lower opioid utilization, and improved patient function at 6 months. These data support PNS as a potentially effective nonopioid analgesic modality in chronic pain, though prospective multicenter evaluation is warranted to evaluate longer-term outcomes.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estimulação Elétrica Nervosa Transcutânea / Neuralgia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Pain Pract Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estimulação Elétrica Nervosa Transcutânea / Neuralgia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Pain Pract Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article