Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Multiple long-term conditions within households and use of health and social care: a retrospective cohort study.
Stafford, Mai; Deeny, Sarah R; Dreyer, Kathryn; Shand, Jenny.
Afiliação
  • Stafford M; The Health Foundation, London, UK mai.stafford@health.org.uk.
  • Deeny SR; The Health Foundation, London, UK.
  • Dreyer K; The Health Foundation, London, UK.
  • Shand J; UCLPartners, London, UK.
BJGP Open ; 5(2)2021 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33234513
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The daily management of long-term conditions falls primarily on individuals and informal carers, but the impact of household context on health and social care activity among people with multiple long-term conditions (MLTCs) is understudied.

AIM:

To test whether co-residence with a person with MLTCs (compared with a co-resident without MLTCs) is associated with utilisation and cost of primary, community, secondary health care, and formal social care. DESIGN &

SETTING:

Linked data from health providers and local government in Barking and Dagenham for a retrospective cohort of people aged ≥50 years in two-person households in 2016-2018.

METHOD:

Two-part regression models were applied to estimate annualised use and cost of hospital, primary, community, mental health, and social care by MLTC status of individuals and co-residents, adjusted for age, sex, and deprivation. Applicability at the national level was tested using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).

RESULTS:

Forty-eight per cent of people with MLTCs in two-person households were co-resident with another person with MLTCs. They were 1.14 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.00 to 1.30) times as likely to have community care activity and 1.24 (95% CI = 0.99 to 1.54) times as likely to have mental health care activity compared with those co-resident with a healthy person. They had more primary care visits (8.5 [95% CI = 8.2 to 8.8] versus 7.9 [95% CI = 7.7 to 8.2]) and higher primary care costs. Outpatient care and elective admissions did not differ. Findings in national data were similar.

CONCLUSION:

Care utilisation for people with MLTCs varies by household context. There may be potential for connecting health and community service input across household members.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 11_ODS3_cobertura_universal / 1_ASSA2030 / 2_ODS3 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Equity_inequality Idioma: En Revista: BJGP Open Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 11_ODS3_cobertura_universal / 1_ASSA2030 / 2_ODS3 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Equity_inequality Idioma: En Revista: BJGP Open Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article