Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of 18F-NaF PET/CT with Other Imaging Methods in the Detection of Bone Metastases in Patients with Medullary Thyroid Cancer: a Report of a Series of 31 Cases.
Ueda, Cristina Emiko; Duarte, Paulo Schiavom; de Castroneves, Luciana Audi; Coura-Filho, George Barbério; Sado, Heitor Naoki; Sapienza, Marcelo Tatit; Hoff, Ana Oliveira; Buchpiguel, Carlos Alberto.
Afiliação
  • Ueda CE; Division of Nuclear Medicine, São Paulo Cancer Institute (ICESP), São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Duarte PS; Division of Nuclear Medicine, São Paulo Cancer Institute (ICESP), São Paulo, Brazil.
  • de Castroneves LA; Division of Endocrinology, São Paulo Cancer Institute (ICESP), São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Coura-Filho GB; Division of Nuclear Medicine, São Paulo Cancer Institute (ICESP), São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Sado HN; Division of Nuclear Medicine, São Paulo Cancer Institute (ICESP), São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Sapienza MT; Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology and Oncology, Medical School of University of São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Hoff AO; Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology and Oncology, Medical School of University of São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Buchpiguel CA; Division of Endocrinology, São Paulo Cancer Institute (ICESP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Nucl Med Mol Imaging ; 54(6): 281-291, 2020 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33281999
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To compare the 18F-NaF PET/CT studies (18F-NaF) with other imaging methods in the detection of skeletal metastases (SM) in patients with medullary thyroid cancer (MTC).

METHODS:

We retrospectively analyzed 31 patients with MTC who performed 18F-NaF to assess SM. The results of the 18F-NaF were compared with other imaging methods performed for metastasis detection 99Tc-MDP bone scan (BS), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), contrast-enhanced CT (CT), and 68Ga-Dotatate and 18F-FDG PET/CT studies. A qualitative analysis comparing the 18F-NaF findings with the ones of the other methods was performed, and the results were classified as superior (>), equal (=), and inferior (<).

RESULTS:

Eleven patients had no bone metastases detected on any of the imaging methods used. Twenty patients presented SM depicted on 18F-NaF. Of these 20 patients, 12 performed bone scan (in 9 18F-NaF > BS and in 3 18F-NaF = BS), 1 performed 18F-FDG (18F-NaF > 18F-FDG), 4 performed 68Ga-Dotatate (in 2 18F-NaF > 68Ga-Dotatate and in 2 18F-NaF = 68Ga-Dotatate), 20 performed CT of at least one body segment (in 15 18F-NaF = CT and in 5 18F-NaF > CT), and 16 performed MRI of at least one body segment, and in all of them, the 18F-NaF was equal to the MRI. Beside this, the 18F-NaF detected SM in body segments not routinely scanned in MRI and CT.

CONCLUSION:

In patients with MTC, the 18F-NaF seems to be equal or superior to other imaging modalities in the detection of SM and allows the analysis of the whole skeletal in a single study.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Revista: Nucl Med Mol Imaging Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Revista: Nucl Med Mol Imaging Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article