Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Treatment patterns and outcomes for cerebellar glioblastoma in the concomitant chemoradiation era: A National Cancer database study.
Zhang, Michael; Li, Richard; Pollom, Erqi L; Amini, Arya; Dandapani, Savita; Li, Gordon.
Afiliação
  • Zhang M; Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford Medical Center, Palo Alto 94304, CA, USA.
  • Li R; Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010, United States.
  • Pollom EL; Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford Medical Center, Palo Alto 94304, CA, USA.
  • Amini A; Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010, United States.
  • Dandapani S; Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010, United States.
  • Li G; Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford Medical Center, Palo Alto 94304, CA, USA. Electronic address: gordonli@stanford.edu.
J Clin Neurosci ; 82(Pt A): 122-127, 2020 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33317719
ABSTRACT
Cerebellar glioblastoma (GB) is much rarer than its supratentorial counterpart, and potentially of different molecular origin. Prior database studies are of limited size and reported on patients who preceded the validation of temozolomide. Thus, we provide an updated population-based analysis of the treatment trends and outcomes since the standardization of GB adjuvant chemoradiation. Patients diagnosed with primary cerebellar and supratentorial GB were identified from the National Cancer Database spanning 2005-2015. Patients were characterized by demographics, extent of resection, and adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation status. Cohorts were primarily and secondarily assessed for overall survival by tumor site and treatment history, respectively. A total of 655 patients with cerebellar GB were identified (0.6%). Cerebellar GB patients, compared to supratentorial GB were more likely to undergo a biopsy or subtotal resection (13.4% vs 9.3% and 16.0% vs 13.4%, p-value < 0.001), and less likely to pursue adjuvant therapy (48.4% vs 52.7%, p-value < 0.001). Overall median survivals were 9.3 and 9.4 months, respectively. On multivariable analysis, gross total resection, radiation, and chemotherapy were found to be predictors of improved overall survival (HR 0.77, p = 0.038; HR 0.67, p < 0.001; and HR = 0.77, p = 0.030, respectively). While many management principles are currently shared between cerebellar and supratentorial GB, aggressive regimens appear less frequently prescribed. Survival continues to match supratentorial outcomes and may benefit from future, systemic guidance by distinguishing molecular features.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Encefálicas / Glioblastoma Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Neurosci Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Encefálicas / Glioblastoma Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Neurosci Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article