Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
NRG Oncology Survey on Practice and Technology Use in SRT and SBRT Delivery.
Chetvertkov, Mikhail; Monroe, James Ira; Boparai, Jaskaran; Solberg, Timothy D; Pafundi, Deanna H; Ruo, Russell L; Gladstone, David J; Yin, Fang-Fang; Chetty, Indrin J; Benedict, Stanley; Followill, David S; Xiao, Ying; Sohn, Jason W.
Afiliação
  • Chetvertkov M; Cancer Institute, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
  • Monroe JI; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mercy Hospital South, St. Louis, MO, United States.
  • Boparai J; Operations Department, NRG Oncology, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
  • Solberg TD; United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States.
  • Pafundi DH; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States.
  • Ruo RL; Department of Medical Physics, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
  • Gladstone DJ; Radiation Oncology Department, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, United States.
  • Yin FF; Radiation Oncology Department, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States.
  • Chetty IJ; Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, United States.
  • Benedict S; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California at Davis, Sacramento, CA, United States.
  • Followill DS; IROC Houston Quality Assurance Center, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
  • Xiao Y; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
  • Sohn JW; Cancer Institute, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Front Oncol ; 10: 602607, 2020.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33330102
PURPOSE: To assess stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT)/stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) practices by polling clinics participating in multi-institutional clinical trials. METHODS: The NRG Oncology Medical Physics Subcommittee distributed a survey consisting of 23 questions, which covered general technologies, policies, and procedures used in the Radiation Oncology field for the delivery of SRT/SBRT (9 questions), and site-specific questions for brain SRT, lung SBRT, and prostate SBRT (14 questions). Surveys were distributed to 1,996 radiotherapy institutions included on the membership rosters of the five National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) groups. Patient setup, motion management, target localization, prescriptions, and treatment delivery technique data were reported back by 568 institutions (28%). RESULTS: 97.5% of respondents treat lung SBRT patients, 77.0% perform brain SRT, and 29.1% deliver prostate SBRT. 48.8% of clinics require a physicist present for every fraction of SBRT, 18.5% require a physicist present for the initial SBRT fraction only, and 14.9% require a physicist present for the entire first fraction, including set-up approval for all subsequent fractions. 55.3% require physician approval for all fractions, and 86.7% do not reposition without x-ray imaging. For brain SRT, most institutions (83.9%) use a planning target volume (PTV) margin of 2 mm or less. Lung SBRT PTV margins of 3 mm or more are used in 80.6% of clinics. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is the dominant delivery method in 62.8% of SRT treatments, 70.9% of lung SBRT, and 68.3% of prostate SBRT. CONCLUSION: This report characterizes SRT/SBRT practices in radiotherapy clinics participating in clinical trials. Data made available here allows the radiotherapy community to compare their practice with that of other clinics, determine what is achievable, and assess areas for improvement.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Oncol Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Oncol Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article