Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
IS ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION STILL LIMITED TO FEW TERTIARY CENTERS IN THE WEST? RESULTS FROM A NATIONAL SURVEY IN BRAZIL.
Arantes, Vitor N; Sanna, Maria das Graças Pimenta; Alves, Jairo Silva; Milhomem-Cardoso, Daniela Medeiros; Maluf-Filho, Fauze.
Afiliação
  • Arantes VN; Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Faculdade de Medicina, Instituto Alfa de Gastroenterologia, Unidade de Endoscopia, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.
  • Sanna MDGP; Hospital Mater Dei Contorno, Unidade de Endoscopia, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.
  • Alves JS; Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Faculdade de Medicina, Instituto Alfa de Gastroenterologia, Unidade de Endoscopia, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.
  • Milhomem-Cardoso DM; Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Faculdade de Medicina, Instituto Alfa de Gastroenterologia, Unidade de Endoscopia, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.
  • Maluf-Filho F; Hospital Geral de Goiânial (HGG), Unidade de Endoscopia, Goiania, GO, Brasil.
Arq Gastroenterol ; 57(4): 477-483, 2020.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33331480
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) enables en bloc excision of superficial neoplasms. Although ESD is widely practiced in Eastern countries like Japan, South Korea and China, its use in the West is supposed to be still limited to few tertiary centers. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the clinical practice of ESD in Brazil by means of an electronic questionnaire elaborated by the Brazilian Society of Digestive Endoscopy (SOBED). METHODS: In October 2019, 3512 endoscopist members of SOBED were invited to respond to an electronic survey containing 40 questions divided into four topics: operator profile; clinical experience with ESD; adverse events and training. Informed consent was requested to all participants. The investigators reviewed all responses and considered valid if more than 50% of the questions were answered and additional information, when requested, was provided. RESULTS: A total of 155 (4.4%) qualified responses entered the study. ESD has been practiced in 22 of 26 Federation States and majority of respondents (32.2%) have 10 to 20 years of practice. ESD has been performed more frequently in private hospitals (101 individuals, 66.9%) and private ambulatory centers (41 individuals, 27.1%). ESD was performed mainly in the stomach (72%), followed by the rectum (57%) and 80% of the individuals reported less than 25 operations. Twenty-four (15.4 %) individuals reported perforation and 4 (2.5%) of them reported postoperative deaths. Approximately a quarter of responders denied hands-on training in models or visit to training centers. CONCLUSION: ESD appears to be practiced throughout the country, not only in tertiary or academic institutions and mainly in private practice. Most operators received limited training and still are at the beginning of their learning curve. The reported adverse events and mortality rates appear to be higher than Eastern reports.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do sul / Asia / Brasil Idioma: En Revista: Arq Gastroenterol Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do sul / Asia / Brasil Idioma: En Revista: Arq Gastroenterol Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article