Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Hemodynamic impact of VASQ device in vascular access creation.
Palumbo, Roberto; Dominijanni, Sara; Centi, Alessia; D'Urso, Gabriele; Tatangelo, Paola; Floccari, Fulvio; Smedile, Gianluca; Niscola, Pasquale; Londrino, Francesco; Di Daniele, Nicola.
Afiliação
  • Palumbo R; Nephrology Unit, ASL Roma2, Saint'Eugenio Hospital, Rome, Italy.
  • Dominijanni S; Nephrology Unit, ASL Roma2, Saint'Eugenio Hospital, Rome, Italy.
  • Centi A; Nephrology Unit, ASL Roma2, Saint'Eugenio Hospital, Rome, Italy.
  • D'Urso G; Nephrology Unit, ASL Roma2, Saint'Eugenio Hospital, Rome, Italy.
  • Tatangelo P; Nephrology Unit, ASL Roma2, Saint'Eugenio Hospital, Rome, Italy.
  • Floccari F; Nephrology Unit, ASL Roma2, Saint'Eugenio Hospital, Rome, Italy.
  • Smedile G; Nephrology Unit, ASL Roma2, Saint'Eugenio Hospital, Rome, Italy.
  • Niscola P; Haematology Unit, ASL Roma2, Saint 'Eugenio Hospital, Rome, Italy.
  • Londrino F; Nephrology Unit, ASL Roma2, Saint'Eugenio Hospital, Rome, Italy.
  • Di Daniele N; UOC of Internal Medicine, Centre of Hypertension and Nephrology Unit, Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
J Vasc Access ; 23(1): 105-108, 2022 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33349129
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Native arteriovenous fistula is the preferred vascular access in term of functionality, efficiency and complication rate. Nevertheless, research continues to seek strategies to reduce the risk of neointimal hyperplasia and hemodynamic modification. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact on hemodynamic of the VasQ device in arteriovenous fistulae creation.

METHODS:

The analysis included patients who underwent to fistula creation with or without implantation of the VasQ device between May and September 2019. The hemodynamic parameters were evaluated pre-operatively and at a follow-up of 1, 3, 6 months. The patency and complication rate were evaluated.

RESULTS:

Fifteen VasQ devices were implanted during 30 arteriovenous fistula surgery. The baseline patients features were similar between groups (VasQ treated/control). At baseline, preoperative arterial flow was similar; radial artery diameter at surgical site was 3.4 ± 0.8 mm in treated and 2.8 ± 0.5 mm in the control group. The mean arterial flow at 1 month was 480 ± 210 mL/min in treated and 561 ± 27 mL/min in the control group. At 3 months the mean arterial flow in treated was 645 ± 143 mL/min versus 824 ± 211 mL/min (p = 0.02) in the control group; at 6 months the arterial flow was 714 ± 146 mL/min versus 810 ± 194 mL/min (p = 0.05) in control group. The cardiac output flow at 6 months in the treated group was 4458 ± 928 mL/min versus 5599 ± 1355 mL/min (p = 0.05) in the control group. At 6 months the primary patency was 73% and 80% and the secondary patency 80% and 86% in treated compared to the control group, respectively. No VASQ device complications were recorded.

CONCLUSION:

The analysis of these data suggested that using VasQ device could be protective against the hemodynamic modification that occur during arteriovenous fistulae creation.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica / Diálise Renal Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Vasc Access Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica / Diálise Renal Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Vasc Access Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article