Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of radical prostatectomy on bladder function as demonstrated on urodynamics study-A systematic review.
Yao, Henry H; Hoe, Venetia; Crump, Robert T; Sengupta, Shomik; O'Connell, Helen E; Carlson, Kevin V; Baverstock, Richard J.
Afiliação
  • Yao HH; Department of Urology, Western Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Hoe V; Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Crump RT; Vesia (Alberta Bladder Centre), Southern Alberta Institute of Urology, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Sengupta S; Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • O'Connell HE; Department of Urology, Western Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Carlson KV; Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Baverstock RJ; Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Neurourol Urodyn ; 40(2): 582-603, 2021 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33476072
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

This study aims to describe the effects of radical prostatectomy (RP) on bladder function by performing a systematic review of urodynamics study findings before and after RP.

METHODS:

This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guideline and registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020206844). A systematic search was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase. Studies were included if they involved men who underwent RP and had urodynamics study performed preoperatively, postoperatively, or both. Studies that included only subgroups of patients based on symptoms were excluded. Three hundred and four articles were screened, with 20 articles included. A qualitative analysis was performed.

RESULTS:

The rate of baseline bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) pre-RP was 19%-67%. All six studies with comparative data pre- and postoperatively demonstrated a decrease in the rate of patients with equivocal or clear obstruction. The baseline rates of detrusor overactivity (DO) varied widely from 11% to 61.2%. Six of eight studies with 6 months or more follow-up showed an improvement in the rates of DO ranging from 3.0% to 12.5%. The rate of de novo DO ranged from 0% to 54.5%. Four studies reported an increased rate of impaired bladder contractility and two of three studies showed a worsening rate of impaired bladder compliance following RP. This review is limited by the absence of level I/II studies.

CONCLUSIONS:

Urodynamics study shows that BOO is improved following RP in most patients. RP resolves DO in some patients and cause de novo DO in others. The net effect is a reduced overall rate of DO in most studies. Bladder compliance and contractility may be impaired after RP.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Prostatectomia / Urodinâmica / Bexiga Urinária Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Neurourol Urodyn Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Prostatectomia / Urodinâmica / Bexiga Urinária Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Neurourol Urodyn Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article