Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Critical inhaler technique errors in Swedish patients with COPD: a cross-sectional study analysing video-recorded demonstrations.
Sulku, Johanna; Bröms, Kristina; Högman, Marieann; Janson, Christer; Lisspers, Karin; Malinovschi, Andrei; Melhus, Håkan; Ställberg, Björn; Nielsen, Elisabet I.
Afiliação
  • Sulku J; Department of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. johanna.sulku@farmaci.uu.se.
  • Bröms K; Centre for Research and Development, Uppsala University/Region Gävleborg, Gävle, Sweden. johanna.sulku@farmaci.uu.se.
  • Högman M; Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Janson C; Department of Medical Sciences, Respiratory, Allergy and Sleep Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Lisspers K; Department of Medical Sciences, Respiratory, Allergy and Sleep Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Malinovschi A; Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Melhus H; Department of Medical Sciences, Clinical Physiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Ställberg B; Department of Medical Sciences, Clinical Pharmacogenomics and Osteoporosis, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Nielsen EI; Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med ; 31(1): 5, 2021 02 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33563979
ABSTRACT
A correct use of inhaler devices is essential in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treatment. Critical errors were studied by analysing 659 video-recorded demonstrations of inhaler technique from 364 COPD patients using six different inhaler device models. The majority of the included patients used two (55%) or more (20%) device models. Overall, 66% of the patients made ≥1 critical error with at least one device model. The corresponding numbers for patients using 1, 2 and ≥3 device models were 43%, 70% and 86%, respectively. The only factor associated with making ≥1 critical error was simultaneous use of two (adjusted odds ratios (aOR) 3.17, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.81, 5.64) or three or more (aOR 8.97, 95% CI 3.93, 22.1) device models. In conclusion, the proportion of patients making critical errors in inhaler technique was substantial, particularly in those using several different device models. To obtain optimal COPD treatment, it is important to assess a patient's inhaler technique and to minimise the number of inhaler device models.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores / Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: NPJ Prim Care Respir Med Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores / Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: NPJ Prim Care Respir Med Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article