Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Greater Loss of Central Adiposity from Low-Carbohydrate versus Low-Fat Diet in Middle-Aged Adults with Overweight and Obesity.
Garr Barry, Valene; Stewart, Mariah; Soleymani, Taraneh; Desmond, Renee A; Goss, Amy M; Gower, Barbara A.
Afiliação
  • Garr Barry V; Department of Nutrition Sciences, School of Health Professions, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1720 University Blvd, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
  • Stewart M; Department of Nutrition Sciences, School of Health Professions, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1720 University Blvd, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
  • Soleymani T; Department of Nutrition Sciences, School of Health Professions, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1720 University Blvd, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
  • Desmond RA; Division of Preventive Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Medical Towers 621, 1717 11th Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35205, USA.
  • Goss AM; Department of Nutrition Sciences, School of Health Professions, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1720 University Blvd, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
  • Gower BA; Department of Nutrition Sciences, School of Health Professions, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1720 University Blvd, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
Nutrients ; 13(2)2021 Jan 31.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33572489
ABSTRACT
The objective of this study is to determine whether middle-aged adults prescribed a low carbohydrate-high fat (LCHF) or low fat (LF) diet would have greater loss of central fat and to determine whether the insulin resistance (IR) affects intervention response. A total of 50 participants (52.3 ± 10.7 years old; 36.6 ± 7.4 kg/m2 BMI; 82% female) were prescribed either a LCHF diet (n = 32, carbohydrate protein fat of 5%30%65% without calorie restriction), or LF diet (n = 18, 63%13-23% 10-25% with calorie restriction of total energy expenditure-500 kcal) for 15 weeks. Central and regional body composition changes from dual-x-ray absorptiometry and serum measures were compared using paired t-tests and ANCOVA with paired contrasts. IR was defined as homeostatic model assessment (HOMA-IR) > 2.6. Compared to the LF group, the LCHF group lost more android (15.6 ± 11.2% vs. 8.3 ± 8.1%, p < 0.01) and visceral fat (18.5 ± 22.2% vs. 5.1 ± 15.8%, p < 0.05). Those with IR lost more android and visceral fat on the LCHF verses LF group (p < 0.05). Therefore, the clinical prescription to a LCHF diet may be an optimal strategy to reduce disease risk in middle-aged adults, particularly those with IR.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Resistência à Insulina / Dieta com Restrição de Gorduras / Obesidade Abdominal / Dieta Rica em Proteínas e Pobre em Carboidratos Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Nutrients Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Resistência à Insulina / Dieta com Restrição de Gorduras / Obesidade Abdominal / Dieta Rica em Proteínas e Pobre em Carboidratos Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Nutrients Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article