Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The importance of the longest R-R interval on 24-hour electrocardiography for mortality prediction in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Zysko, Dorota; Persson, Anders; Obremska, Marta; Leskiewicz, Marcin; Fedorowski, Artur; Sutton, Richard; Johnson, Linda Sb.
Afiliação
  • Zysko D; Department of Emergency Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
  • Persson A; Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
  • Obremska M; Department of Preclinical Research, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
  • Leskiewicz M; Department of Emergency Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
  • Fedorowski A; Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
  • Sutton R; Department of Cardiology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
  • Johnson LS; Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
Kardiol Pol ; 79(3): 311-318, 2021 03 25.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33599460
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Heart rate control in atrial fibrillation (AF) is typically assessed by 24­hour electrocardiography (ECG). There are scarce data on the use of 24­hour ECG parameters to predict mortality in patients with AF.

AIMS:

We aimed to identify 24­hour ECG parameters that predict mortality in patients with AF.

METHODS:

We enrolled 280 ambulatory patients (mean [SD] age, 72 [8.7] years; 57.9% men) with permanent or persistent AF. Data on mortality and pacemaker or defibrillator implantation during follow­up were collected. Predictors of mortality were assessed using the Cox proportional hazards model and C statistic.

RESULTS:

Compared with survivors, 78 patients (28%) who died were older, more often had comorbidities, left bundle branch block (LBBB), reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, lower maximum heart rate, higher number of ventricular extrasystoles, and the longest R­R interval below 2 seconds. Univariate analysis showed higher mortality in patients with the longest R­R intervals below 2 seconds compared with those with R­R intervals of 2 seconds or longer (P <0.001). Independent mortality predictors in the regression model included older age, renal failure, history of coronary intervention, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, LBBB, and a high number (≥770) or absence of R­R intervals of at least 2 seconds. The area under the curve for mortality prediction increased after including ECG parameters (0.748; 95% CI, 0.686-0.81; vs 0.688; 95% CI, 0.618-0.758; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS:

A high number of R­R intervals longer than 2 seconds or their absence on 24­hour ECG may predict mortality in patients with AF.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 6_ODS3_enfermedades_notrasmisibles Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fibrilação Atrial Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Kardiol Pol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 6_ODS3_enfermedades_notrasmisibles Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fibrilação Atrial Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Kardiol Pol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article