Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Quantifying the potential value of antigen-detection rapid diagnostic tests for COVID-19: a modelling analysis.
Ricks, Saskia; Kendall, Emily A; Dowdy, David W; Sacks, Jilian A; Schumacher, Samuel G; Arinaminpathy, Nimalan.
Afiliação
  • Ricks S; MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Imperial College London, London, UK. saskia.ricks12@imperial.ac.uk.
  • Kendall EA; Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Dowdy DW; Department of Epidemiology, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Sacks JA; Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Schumacher SG; Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Arinaminpathy N; MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Imperial College London, London, UK.
BMC Med ; 19(1): 75, 2021 03 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33685466
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Testing plays a critical role in treatment and prevention responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Compared to nucleic acid tests (NATs), antigen-detection rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs) can be more accessible, but typically have lower sensitivity and specificity. By quantifying these trade-offs, we aimed to inform decisions about when an Ag-RDT would offer greater public health value than reliance on NAT.

METHODS:

Following an expert consultation, we selected two use cases for

analysis:

rapid identification of people with COVID-19 amongst patients admitted with respiratory symptoms in a 'hospital' setting and early identification and isolation of people with mildly symptomatic COVID-19 in a 'community' setting. Using decision analysis, we evaluated the health system cost and health impact (deaths averted and infectious days isolated) of an Ag-RDT-led strategy, compared to a strategy based on NAT and clinical judgement. We adopted a broad range of values for 'contextual' parameters relevant to a range of settings, including the availability of NAT and the performance of clinical judgement. We performed a multivariate sensitivity analysis to all of these parameters.

RESULTS:

In a hospital setting, an Ag-RDT-led strategy would avert more deaths than a NAT-based strategy, and at lower cost per death averted, when the sensitivity of clinical judgement is less than 90%, and when NAT results are available in time to inform clinical decision-making for less than 85% of patients. The use of an Ag-RDT is robustly supported in community settings, where it would avert more transmission at lower cost than relying on NAT alone, under a wide range of assumptions.

CONCLUSIONS:

Despite their imperfect sensitivity and specificity, Ag-RDTs have the potential to be simultaneously more impactful, and have a lower cost per death and infectious person-days averted, than current approaches to COVID-19 diagnostic testing.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 4_TD / 6_ODS3_enfermedades_notrasmisibles Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Teste para COVID-19 / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Med Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 4_TD / 6_ODS3_enfermedades_notrasmisibles Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Teste para COVID-19 / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Med Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article