Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Repeated onabotulinum neurotoxin A injections for drooling in children with neurodisability.
Bekkers, Stijn; Leow, Theresa Ys; Van Hulst, Karen; Orriëns, Lynn B; Scheffer, Arthur Rt; Van Den Hoogen, Frank Ja.
Afiliação
  • Bekkers S; Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Leow TY; Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Van Hulst K; Department of Rehabilitation, Radboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Orriëns LB; Department of Rehabilitation, Radboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Scheffer AR; Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Van Den Hoogen FJ; Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Dev Med Child Neurol ; 63(8): 991-997, 2021 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33772779
ABSTRACT

AIM:

To evaluate the effect of repeated onabotulinum neurotoxin A injections for the treatment of drooling in children with neurodisabilities.

METHOD:

This was a retrospective cohort study, in which the first, second, and third onabotulinum neurotoxin A injection were compared within children treated between 2000 and 2020. Primary outcomes included drooling quotient, visual analogue scale (VAS), and treatment success defined as ≥50% reduction in drooling quotient and/or VAS 8 weeks after treatment. Each outcome was obtained at baseline and 8 weeks posttreatment.

RESULTS:

Seventy-seven children were included (mean age at first injection 8y 3mo, SD 3y 7mo, range 3-17y; 44 males, 33 females; 51.9% with cerebral palsy, 45.5% wheelchair-bound). The objective (drooling quotient) and subjective (VAS) effect after the second injection was lower compared to the first injection. The third injection showed less objective and significantly less subjective effect compared to the first injection. An overall success rate of 74.0%, 41.6%, and 45.8% were found for the first, second, and third injection respectively.

INTERPRETATION:

Although onabotulinum neurotoxin A remained effective throughout the entire treatment course, there is less effect of subsequent onabotulinum neurotoxin A injections compared to the first. Although there might be a loss of effect after repeated injections, there is continued improvement for most children. What this paper adds Repeated injections show a diminished treatment effect after the second injection. A continued improvement is seen in most patients.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sialorreia / Paralisia Cerebral / Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A / Fármacos Neuromusculares Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Dev Med Child Neurol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sialorreia / Paralisia Cerebral / Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A / Fármacos Neuromusculares Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Dev Med Child Neurol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article