Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Treatment planning facilitates clinical decision making for hyperthermia treatments.
Kok, H P; van der Zee, J; Guirado, F Navarro; Bakker, A; Datta, N R; Abdel-Rahman, S; Schmidt, M; Wust, P; Crezee, J.
Afiliação
  • Kok HP; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van der Zee J; Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Guirado FN; Department of Medical Physics, Regional University Hospital of Málaga, Malaga, Spain.
  • Bakker A; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Datta NR; Kantonsspital Aarau, Centre for Radiation Oncology KSA-KSB, Aarau, Switzerland.
  • Abdel-Rahman S; Department of Medicine III, University Hospital LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Schmidt M; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Wust P; Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
  • Crezee J; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Int J Hyperthermia ; 38(1): 532-551, 2021 01 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33784914
Background: Treatment quality is important in clinical hyperthermia. Guideline-based treatment protocols are used to determine system settings and treatment strategies to ensure effective tumor heating and prevent unwanted treatment-limiting normal tissue hot spots. Realizing both these goals can prove challenging using generic guideline-based and operator-dependent treatment strategies. Hyperthermia treatment planning (HTP) can be very useful to support treatment strategies. Although HTP is increasingly integrated into the standard clinical workflow, active clinical application is still limited to a small number of hyperthermia centers and should be further stimulated.Purpose: This paper aims to serve as a practical guide, demonstrating how HTP can be applied in clinical decision making for both superficial and locoregional hyperthermia treatments.HTP in clinical decision making: Seven problems that occur in daily clinical practice are described and we show how HTP can enhance insight to formulate an adequate treatment strategy. Examples use representative commercially available hyperthermia devices and cover all stages during the clinical workflow. Problems include selecting adequate phase settings, heating ability analysis, hot spot suppression, applicator selection, evaluation of target coverage and heating depth, and predicting possible thermal toxicity in case of an implant. Since we aim to promote a general use of HTP in daily practice, basic simulation strategies are used in these problems, avoiding a need for the application of dedicated advanced optimization routines that are not generally available.Conclusion: Even fairly basic HTP can facilitate clinical decision making, providing a meaningful and clinically relevant contribution to maintaining and improving treatment quality.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Terapia Assistida por Computador / Hipertermia Induzida Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Hyperthermia Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Terapia Assistida por Computador / Hipertermia Induzida Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Hyperthermia Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article